Sheldon Julie D, Stacy Nicole I, Blake Stephen, Cabrera Fredy, Deem Sharon L
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2016 Mar;47(1):196-205. doi: 10.1638/2015-0159.1.
Reptile hematologic data provide important health information for conservation efforts of vulnerable wildlife species such as the Galapagos tortoise (Chelonoidis spp.). Given the reported discrepancies between manual leukocyte counts for nonmammalian species, two manual leukocyte quantification methods, the Natt and Herrick's (NH) and the Eopette (EO), were compared to white blood cell (WBC) estimates from blood films of 42 free-living, clinically healthy, adult female Galapagos tortoises. To investigate the effects of delay in sample processing, estimated WBC counts and leukocyte differentials were compared for blood films prepared at time of collection under field conditions (T0) to blood films prepared from samples that were stored for 18-23 hr at 4°C in the laboratory (T1). Passing-Bablok regression analysis revealed no constant or proportional error between the NH and WBC estimates (T0 and T1) with slopes of 1.1 and 0.9, respectively. However both constant and proportional errors were present between EO and WBC estimates (T0 and T1) with slopes of 3.1 and 2.7, respectively. Bland Altman plots also showed agreement between the NH and WBC estimates where the points fell within the confidence-interval limit lines and were evenly distributed about the mean. In contrast, the EO and WBC estimate comparisons showed numerous points above the upper limit line, especially at higher concentrations. WBC estimates obtained from T0 and T1 films were in agreement, whereas heterophil and monocyte percentages based on differentials were not. Cell morphology and preservation were superior in T0 blood films because thrombocytes exhibited swelling after storage, becoming difficult to differentiate from lymphocytes. In this study, the highest quality and most reliable hematologic data in Galapagos tortoises were obtained by combining immediate blood film preparation with the NH leukocyte quantification method and a confirmatory WBC estimate from the blood film.
爬行动物的血液学数据为加拉帕戈斯陆龟(Chelonoidis spp.)等濒危野生动物物种的保护工作提供了重要的健康信息。鉴于已报道的非哺乳动物物种手工白细胞计数之间存在差异,将两种手工白细胞定量方法,即纳特和赫里克法(NH)以及微量移液器法(EO),与42只自由生活、临床健康的成年雌性加拉帕戈斯陆龟血涂片的白细胞(WBC)估计值进行了比较。为了研究样本处理延迟的影响,将现场条件下采集时制备的血涂片(T0)与在实验室4°C下储存18 - 23小时的样本制备的血涂片(T1)的估计白细胞计数和白细胞分类进行了比较。通过-巴布洛赫回归分析显示,NH与白细胞估计值(T0和T1)之间不存在恒定或比例误差,斜率分别为1.1和0.9。然而,EO与白细胞估计值(T0和T1)之间同时存在恒定和比例误差,斜率分别为3.1和2.7。布兰德-奥特曼图也显示NH与白细胞估计值之间具有一致性,各点落在置信区间界限内且围绕均值均匀分布。相比之下,EO与白细胞估计值的比较显示,许多点高于上限线,尤其是在较高浓度时。从T0和T1血涂片获得的白细胞估计值一致,而基于分类的嗜异性粒细胞和单核细胞百分比不一致。T0血涂片的细胞形态和保存状况更佳,因为血小板在储存后出现肿胀,难以与淋巴细胞区分。在本研究中,通过将即时血涂片制备与NH白细胞定量方法以及血涂片的白细胞确认估计相结合,获得了加拉帕戈斯陆龟最高质量和最可靠的血液学数据。