Suppr超能文献

IgA肾病牛津分类法病理预后参数的可重复性:日本厚生劳动省队列研究

Reproducibility for pathological prognostic parameters of the Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: a Japanese cohort study of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare.

作者信息

Hisano Satoshi, Joh Kensuke, Katafuchi Ritsuko, Shimizu Akira, Hashiguchi Noriaki, Kawamura Tetsuya, Matsuo Seiichi

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Nanakuma 7-45-1, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.

Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2017 Feb;21(1):92-96. doi: 10.1007/s10157-016-1258-8. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) was proposed by international working group in 2009. Interobserver reproducibility of each pathological definition was already evaluated, but that of four pathological prognostic parameters score has not yet been assessed. We first assess the reproducibility of each pathological definition in Japanese patients. Our study is aimed to assess that of four pathological prognostic parameters score among the five Japanese pathologists.

METHODS

The renal specimens from 411 Japanese patients, aged 3-85 years, with biopsied proven primary IgAN were collected from 50 facilities between 2006 and 2012. The reproducibility of pathological definitions was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and that of four pathological prognostic parameters score (mesangial hypercellularity (M), endocapillary hypercellularity (E), segmental glomerulosclerosis (S), and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T)) was assessed by kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The ICC of M, E, S, T, global sclerosis and cellular crescents and/or fibrocellular crescents were good or moderate agreement among the five pathologists and were well agreed with results of the Oxford study. Kappa statistics was moderate agreement for M and T score assessed with the semi-quantitative method by the Oxford group, but that was poor agreement for S and E score based on a simple "present" or "absent" assessment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report to assess the reproducibility of pathological prognostic parameters score in the Oxford classification. Our study supports the utilization of the pathological lesions in routine diagnosis. The methodological assessment of pathological prognostic parameters score should be reconsidered.

摘要

背景/目的:IgA肾病(IgAN)的牛津分类由国际工作组于2009年提出。已对每个病理定义的观察者间再现性进行了评估,但四个病理预后参数评分的观察者间再现性尚未评估。我们首先评估日本患者中每个病理定义的再现性。本研究旨在评估五名日本病理学家对四个病理预后参数评分的再现性。

方法

收集了2006年至2012年间来自50个机构的411例3至85岁经活检证实为原发性IgAN的日本患者的肾标本。通过组内相关系数(ICC)评估病理定义的再现性,通过kappa统计评估四个病理预后参数评分(系膜细胞增生(M)、内皮细胞增生(E)、节段性肾小球硬化(S)和肾小管萎缩/间质纤维化(T))的再现性。

结果

五名病理学家对M、E、S、T、全球硬化以及细胞性新月体和/或纤维细胞性新月体的ICC具有良好或中等一致性,并且与牛津研究的结果高度一致。牛津组采用半定量方法评估的M和T评分的kappa统计具有中等一致性,但基于简单的“存在”或“不存在”评估的S和E评分的一致性较差。

结论

这是第一份评估牛津分类中病理预后参数评分再现性的报告。我们的研究支持在常规诊断中利用病理病变。应重新考虑病理预后参数评分的方法学评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验