Suppr超能文献

丛集性头痛的氧疗。一项面罩比较试验。一项单盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。

Oxygen therapy for cluster headache. A mask comparison trial. A single-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

作者信息

Petersen Anja S, Barloese Mads Cj, Lund Nunu Lt, Jensen Rigmor H

机构信息

Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2017 Mar;37(3):214-224. doi: 10.1177/0333102416637817. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this article is to investigate possible differences in effect between three types of masks in the acute treatment of cluster headache (CH). Patients and methods Fifty-seven CH patients according to ICHD-II-criteria participated in a single-blinded, semi-randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover inpatient study, and 102 CH attacks were treated with 100% oxygen delivered by demand valve oxygen (DVO), Optimask or simple mask (15 liters/min) or placebo delivered by DVO for 15 minutes. Primary endpoint: Two-point decrease of pain on a five-point rating scale within 15 minutes. Results Only 10 CH patients had multiple attacks and reached the point of placebo. There were no significant differences between masks in the primary endpoints ( p = 0.412). After 15 minutes 48% had a two-point decrease using the DVO compared to 45% with placebo ( p = 0.867). After 30 minutes 68% were pain free or had pain relief using DVO and 45% by placebo ( p = 0.061). The DVO was preferred by 62% compared to 5% and 33% for simple mask ( p < 0.0001) and Optimask ( p = 0.061). In the first attack the DVO was significantly better at achieving pain relief at 15 minutes ( p = 0.018). Treatment with DVO or Optimask reduced the need for rescue medication compared to the simple mask (23%, 19%, 50%, respectively). No treatment-related adverse events were observed. Conclusion The primary endpoint with pain relief at 15 minutes was non-significant; however, a post hoc analysis of the first attack significantly favored DVO. Further, therapy by Optimask and DVO resulted in a decreased need for rescue medication. We recommend that CH patients be offered DVO or Optimask before oxygen therapy is abandoned.

摘要

目的 本文旨在研究三种类型的面罩在丛集性头痛(CH)急性治疗中的效果差异。

患者与方法 57例符合国际头痛疾病分类第二版(ICHD-II)标准的CH患者参与了一项单盲、半随机、安慰剂对照、交叉住院研究,102次CH发作分别接受按需阀给氧(DVO)、Optimask或简易面罩(15升/分钟)输送的100%氧气治疗,或DVO输送的安慰剂治疗15分钟。主要终点:在五点评分量表上15分钟内疼痛减轻两分。

结果 只有10例CH患者有多次发作并达到安慰剂对照点。各面罩在主要终点方面无显著差异(p = 0.412)。15分钟后,使用DVO的患者中有48%疼痛减轻两分,而使用安慰剂的患者为45%(p = 0.867)。30分钟后,使用DVO的患者中有68%无痛或疼痛缓解,使用安慰剂的患者为45%(p = 0.061)。62%的患者更喜欢DVO,而喜欢简易面罩的为5%,喜欢Optimask的为33%(p < 0.0001),喜欢Optimask的为(p = 0.061)。在首次发作时,DVO在15分钟时实现疼痛缓解方面明显更好(p = 0.018)。与简易面罩相比,使用DVO或Optimask治疗可减少急救药物的需求(分别为23%、19%、50%)。未观察到与治疗相关的不良事件。

结论 15分钟时疼痛缓解的主要终点无统计学意义;然而,对首次发作的事后分析明显有利于DVO。此外,Optimask和DVO治疗可减少急救药物的需求。我们建议在放弃氧疗之前,为CH患者提供DVO或Optimask。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验