文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

暴露前预防的开放标签随机试验——PROUD研究的基线数据分析

An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis.

作者信息

Dolling David I, Desai Monica, McOwan Alan, Gilson Richard, Clarke Amanda, Fisher Martin, Schembri Gabriel, Sullivan Ann K, Mackie Nicola, Reeves Iain, Portman Mags, Saunders John, Fox Julie, Bayley Jake, Brady Michael, Bowman Christine, Lacey Charles J, Taylor Stephen, White David, Antonucci Simone, Gafos Mitzy, McCormack Sheena, Gill Owen N, Dunn David T, Nardone Anthony

机构信息

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.

HIV/STI Department, Public Health England, London, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2016 Mar 24;17:163. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4.


DOI:10.1186/s13063-016-1286-4
PMID:27013513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4806447/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven biological efficacy to reduce the sexual acquisition of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The PROUD study found that PrEP conferred higher protection than in placebo-controlled trials, reducing HIV incidence by 86 % in a population with seven-fold higher HIV incidence than expected. We present the baseline characteristics of the PROUD study population and place the findings in the context of national sexual health clinic data. METHODS: The PROUD study was designed to explore the real-world effectiveness of PrEP (tenofovir-emtricitabine) by randomising HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men (GMSM) to receive open-label PrEP immediately or after a deferral period of 12 months. At enrolment, participants self-completed two baseline questionnaires collecting information on demographics, sexual behaviour and lifestyle in the last 30 and 90 days. These data were compared to data from HIV-negative GMSM attending sexual health clinics in 2013, collated by Public Health England using the genitourinary medicine clinic activity database (GUMCAD). RESULTS: The median age of participants was 35 (IQR: 29-43). Typically participants were white (81 %), educated at a university level (61 %) and in full-time employment (72 %). Of all participants, 217 (40 %) were born outside the UK. A sexually transmitted infection (STI) was reported to have been diagnosed in the previous 12 months in 330/515 (64 %) and 473/544 (87 %) participants reported ever having being diagnosed with an STI. At enrolment, 47/280 (17 %) participants were diagnosed with an STI. Participants reported a median (IQR) of 10 (5-20) partners in the last 90 days, a median (IQR) of 2 (1-5) were condomless sex acts where the participant was receptive and 2 (1-6) were condomless where the participant was insertive. Post-exposure prophylaxis had been prescribed to 184 (34 %) participants in the past 12 months. The number of STI diagnoses was high compared to those reported in GUMCAD attendees. CONCLUSIONS: The PROUD study population are at substantially higher risk of acquiring HIV infection sexually than the overall population of GMSM attending sexual health clinics in England. These findings contribute to explaining the extraordinary HIV incidence rate during follow-up and demonstrate that, despite broad eligibility criteria, the population interested in PrEP was highly selective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN94465371 . Date of registration: 28 February 2013.

摘要

背景:暴露前预防(PrEP)已被证明具有生物学功效,可减少通过性行为感染人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)。“PROUD研究”发现,PrEP提供的保护作用高于安慰剂对照试验,在HIV感染率比预期高7倍的人群中,将HIV发病率降低了86%。我们展示了“PROUD研究”人群的基线特征,并将研究结果置于国家性健康诊所数据的背景下进行分析。 方法:“PROUD研究”旨在探讨PrEP(替诺福韦-恩曲他滨)在现实世界中的有效性,将HIV阴性的男同性恋者及其他与男性发生性行为的男性(GMSM)随机分为两组,一组立即接受开放标签的PrEP,另一组在延迟12个月后接受。在入组时,参与者自行填写两份基线调查问卷,收集过去30天和90天内的人口统计学、性行为和生活方式信息。这些数据与2013年在性健康诊所就诊的HIV阴性GMSM的数据进行比较,这些数据由英国公共卫生部门使用性传播疾病诊所活动数据库(GUMCAD)整理。 结果:参与者的中位年龄为35岁(四分位间距:29 - 43岁)。通常,参与者为白人(81%),接受过大学教育(61%),且为全职工作(72%)。在所有参与者中,217人(40%)出生在英国境外。在过去12个月内,330/515名(64%)参与者报告曾被诊断出患有性传播感染(STI),473/544名(87%)参与者报告曾被诊断出患有STI。在入组时,47/280名(17%)参与者被诊断出患有STI。参与者报告在过去90天内的性伴侣中位数(四分位间距)为10名(5 - 20名),其中中位数(四分位间距)为2次(1 - 5次)是在接受性行为时未使用避孕套,2次(1 - 6次)是在插入性行为时未使用避孕套。在过去12个月内,184名(34%)参与者曾接受过暴露后预防治疗。与GUMCAD就诊者报告的STI诊断数量相比,该研究中的STI诊断数量较高。 结论:“PROUD研究”人群通过性行为感染HIV的风险显著高于在英国性健康诊所就诊的GMSM总体人群。这些发现有助于解释随访期间异常高的HIV发病率,并表明尽管入选标准宽泛,但对PrEP感兴趣的人群具有高度选择性。 试验注册:当前受控试验ISRCTN94465371。注册日期:2013年2月28日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b2c/4806447/3b69c3f0cd9c/13063_2016_1286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b2c/4806447/25f5c226f560/13063_2016_1286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b2c/4806447/3b69c3f0cd9c/13063_2016_1286_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b2c/4806447/25f5c226f560/13063_2016_1286_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b2c/4806447/3b69c3f0cd9c/13063_2016_1286_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
An analysis of baseline data from the PROUD study: an open-label randomised trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Trials. 2016-3-24

[2]
Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial.

Lancet. 2016-1-2

[3]
Efficacy, safety, and effect on sexual behaviour of on-demand pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in men who have sex with men: an observational cohort study.

Lancet HIV. 2017-7-23

[4]
Emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide vs emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (DISCOVER): primary results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.

Lancet. 2020-7-25

[5]
Chemsex is not a barrier to self-reported daily PrEP adherence among PROUD study participants.

Int J Drug Policy. 2019-11-15

[6]
Retention, engagement, and adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men and transgender women in PrEP Brasil: 48 week results of a demonstration study.

Lancet HIV. 2018-2-18

[7]
Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Infection Integrated With Municipal- and Community-Based Sexual Health Services.

JAMA Intern Med. 2016-1

[8]
Association of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis With Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Individuals at High Risk of HIV Infection.

JAMA. 2019-4-9

[9]
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and its implementation in the PrEP Impact Trial in England: a pragmatic health technology assessment.

Lancet HIV. 2023-12

[10]
Trends in HIV incidence between 2013-2019 and association of baseline factors with subsequent incident HIV among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics in England: A prospective cohort study.

PLoS Med. 2021-6

引用本文的文献

[1]
: Biosexual citizenship and hope in stories of PrEP activism.

Somatechnics. 2020-8

[2]
"Sex without fear": exploring the psychosocial impact of oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis on gay men in England.

AIDS Res Ther. 2023-11-14

[3]
Demand creation and retention strategies for oral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men and transgender women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Infect Dis. 2023-11-14

[4]
The HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis continuum of care among women who inject drugs: A systematic review.

Front Psychiatry. 2022-8-26

[5]
Chemsex Practices in PrEP: Beyond Addiction and Risk Toward a Healthy Sex Life-Baseline Experiences from a Hospital-Based PrEP Program in Barcelona, Spain.

AIDS Behav. 2022-12

[6]
Perceptions and Practicalities Influencing Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in England.

AIDS Behav. 2022-8

[7]
Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.

MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021-7-23

[8]
Incident Cases of Sexually Transmitted Infections among Users of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in Honolulu, Hawai'i.

Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2021-7

[9]
"PROUD to have been involved": an evaluation of participant and community involvement in the PROUD HIV prevention trial.

Res Involv Engagem. 2020-4-17

[10]
Perspectives on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis use amongst female sex workers in Harare, Zimbabwe.

South Afr J HIV Med. 2020-2-19

本文引用的文献

[1]
Effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis and combination HIV prevention for men who have sex with men in the UK: a mathematical modelling study.

Lancet HIV. 2016-1-14

[2]
Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial.

Lancet. 2016-1-2

[3]
Healthcare providers' knowledge of, attitudes to and practice of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection.

HIV Med. 2016-2

[4]
A cost-effectiveness analysis of HIV preexposure prophylaxis for men who have sex with men in Australia.

Clin Infect Dis. 2014-1-2

[5]
Prevalence, risk factors, and uptake of interventions for sexually transmitted infections in Britain: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal).

Lancet. 2013-11-26

[6]
HIV incidence among men with and those without sexually transmitted rectal infections: estimates from matching against an HIV case registry.

Clin Infect Dis. 2013-6-25

[7]
The cost and impact of scaling up pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness modelling studies.

PLoS Med. 2013-3-12

[8]
Financial policy issues for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: cost and access to insurance.

Am J Prev Med. 2013-1

[9]
The potential impact of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men and transwomen in Lima, Peru: a mathematical modelling study.

PLoS Med. 2012-10-9

[10]
FDA paves the way for pre-exposure HIV prophylaxis.

Lancet. 2012-7-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索