Nicenboim Bruno, Logačev Pavel, Gattei Carolina, Vasishth Shravan
Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Grupo de Lingüística y Neurobiología Experimental del Lenguaje, INCIHUSA, CONICET Mendoza, Argentina.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 8;7:280. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00280. eCollection 2016.
We examined the effects of argument-head distance in SVO and SOV languages (Spanish and German), while taking into account readers' working memory capacity and controlling for expectation (Levy, 2008) and other factors. We predicted only locality effects, that is, a slowdown produced by increased dependency distance (Gibson, 2000; Lewis and Vasishth, 2005). Furthermore, we expected stronger locality effects for readers with low working memory capacity. Contrary to our predictions, low-capacity readers showed faster reading with increased distance, while high-capacity readers showed locality effects. We suggest that while the locality effects are compatible with memory-based explanations, the speedup of low-capacity readers can be explained by an increased probability of retrieval failure. We present a computational model based on ACT-R built under the previous assumptions, which is able to give a qualitative account for the present data and can be tested in future research. Our results suggest that in some cases, interpreting longer RTs as indexing increased processing difficulty and shorter RTs as facilitation may be too simplistic: The same increase in processing difficulty may lead to slowdowns in high-capacity readers and speedups in low-capacity ones. Ignoring individual level capacity differences when investigating locality effects may lead to misleading conclusions.
我们研究了主谓宾(SVO)和主宾谓(SOV)语言(西班牙语和德语)中论元-中心语距离的影响,同时考虑了读者的工作记忆容量,并控制了预期(利维,2008)及其他因素。我们仅预测了局部性效应,即依赖距离增加所导致的阅读速度减慢(吉布森,2000;刘易斯和瓦西什,2005)。此外,我们预计工作记忆容量低的读者会有更强的局部性效应。与我们的预测相反,低容量读者在距离增加时阅读速度更快,而高容量读者则表现出局部性效应。我们认为,虽然局部性效应与基于记忆的解释相符,但低容量读者阅读速度的加快可以用检索失败概率增加来解释。我们提出了一个基于ACT-R的计算模型,该模型基于先前的假设构建,能够对当前数据做出定性解释,并可在未来研究中进行检验。我们的结果表明,在某些情况下,将较长的反应时解释为索引处理难度增加,而将较短的反应时解释为促进作用可能过于简单:相同的处理难度增加可能导致高容量读者阅读速度减慢,而低容量读者阅读速度加快。在研究局部性效应时忽略个体水平的容量差异可能会导致误导性结论。