Izuishi Kunihiko, Mori Hirohito
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Federation of Public Services and Affiliated Personnel Aid Associations, Takamatsu Hospital, Kagawa 760-0018, Japan.
Departments of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University School of Medicine,Kagawa 761-0793, Japan.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016 Mar;25(1):87-94. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.251.rv2.
Recently, many strategies have been reported for the effective treatment of gastric cancer. However, the strategy for treating stage IV gastric cancer remains controversial. Conducting a prospective phase III study in stage IV cancer patients is difficult because of heterogeneous performance status, age, and degree of cancer metastasis or extension. Due to poor prognosis, the variance in physical status, and severe symptoms, it is important to determine the optimal strategy for treating each individual stage IV patient. In the past decade, many reports have addressed topics related to stage IV gastric cancer: the 7th Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) TNM staging system has altered its stage IV classification; new chemotherapy regimens have been developed through the randomized ECF for advanced and locally advanced esophagogastric cancer (REAL)-II, S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 in RCT in the treatment for stomach cancer (SPIRITS), trastuzumab for gastric cancer (ToGA), ramucirumab monotherapy for previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD), and ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously-treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW) trials; and the survival efficacy of palliative gastrectomy has been denied by the reductive gastrectomy for advanced tumor in three Asian countries (REGATTA) trial. Current strategies for treating stage IV patients can be roughly divided into the following five categories: palliative gastrectomy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, gastric stent, or bypass. In this article, we review recent publications and guidelines along with above categories in the light of individual symptoms and prognosis.
最近,已经报道了许多有效治疗胃癌的策略。然而,治疗IV期胃癌的策略仍存在争议。由于患者的表现状态、年龄以及癌症转移或扩散程度存在异质性,对IV期癌症患者进行前瞻性III期研究很困难。由于预后差、身体状况差异以及严重症状,确定治疗每位IV期患者的最佳策略非常重要。在过去十年中,许多报告都涉及了与IV期胃癌相关的主题:国际癌症控制联盟(UICC)第7版TNM分期系统改变了其IV期分类;通过晚期和局部晚期食管胃癌随机化的ECF(REAL)-II、胃癌治疗中S-1加顺铂与S-1的随机对照试验(SPIRITS)、曲妥珠单抗治疗胃癌(ToGA)、雷莫西尤单抗单药治疗先前治疗过的晚期胃癌或胃食管交界腺癌(REGARD)以及雷莫西尤单抗加紫杉醇与安慰剂加紫杉醇治疗先前治疗过的晚期胃癌或胃食管交界腺癌患者(RAINBOW)试验开发了新的化疗方案;并且在三个亚洲国家进行的晚期肿瘤缩小性胃切除术(REGATTA)试验否定了姑息性胃切除术的生存疗效。目前治疗IV期患者的策略大致可分为以下五类:姑息性胃切除术、化疗、放疗、胃支架或旁路手术。在本文中,我们根据个体症状和预后,结合上述类别回顾最近的出版物和指南。