Forman Adam, Auzanneau France-Isabelle
Department of Chemistry, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
Department of Chemistry, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada.
Carbohydr Res. 2016 Apr 29;425:10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Using trisaccharide diol acceptors displaying two glucosamine residues free at O-3, we observed that α-l-fucosylation with α armed donor proceeded smoothly at the most accessible N-trichloroacetyl nonreducing end glucosamine residue. In contrast, glycosylations with peracetylated glycosyl bromide donors activated under Helferich conditions seemed to proceed preferentially or exclusively at the more sterically hindered N-acetylated reducing end unit. Thus, we concluded that disarmed donors were mismatched at O-3 of the N-trichloroacetylated glucosamine residue regardless of α or β configuration of the glycosidic bond formed and d or l configuration of the donor. Interestingly orthoester formation occurred in some cases at this position while they were not observed at the reducing end unit. Conversion of the nonreducing end trichloroacetamido to an acetamido allowed the Helferich catalyzed galactosylation to occur at both positions and revealed the impact of the N-trichloroacetamido on the mismatched glycosylations. Changing the activation conditions from the mild Lewis acid Hg(CN)2 to the stronger acid AgOTf revealed that in fact β-d-galactosylation at the less hindered N-trichloroacetylated residue was kinetically favored over that at the reducing end residue. Isolation of equal amounts of orthoester at this position suggested that it was formed first but that the strong AgOTf Lewis acid was able to promote rearrangement to the β-d-galactosidic bond. These results shed additional light on the apparent mismatch of disarmed glycosyl donors with hydroxyl groups deemed more accessible. Depending on electronic factors imposed by the acceptor and activation conditions, transient unstable orthoester formation may explain in some cases why these donors appear mismatched with the most accessible hydroxyl groups which are otherwise glycosylated by armed donors.
使用在O-3位具有两个游离氨基葡萄糖残基的三糖二醇受体,我们观察到,用α-武装供体进行的α-L-岩藻糖基化反应在最易接近的N-三氯乙酰化非还原端氨基葡萄糖残基处顺利进行。相比之下,在Helferich条件下活化的全乙酰化糖基溴供体的糖基化反应似乎优先或仅在空间位阻较大的N-乙酰化还原端单元处进行。因此,我们得出结论,无论所形成糖苷键的α或β构型以及供体的d或l构型如何,脱武装供体在N-三氯乙酰化氨基葡萄糖残基的O-3位均不匹配。有趣的是,在某些情况下,该位置会发生原酸酯形成,而在还原端单元未观察到这种情况。将非还原端三氯乙酰胺转化为乙酰胺可使Helferich催化的半乳糖基化反应在两个位置都发生,并揭示了N-三氯乙酰胺对不匹配糖基化反应的影响。将活化条件从温和的路易斯酸Hg(CN)2改为更强的酸AgOTf表明,实际上,在空间位阻较小的N-三氯乙酰化残基处进行的β-D-半乳糖基化反应在动力学上比在还原端残基处更有利。在该位置分离出等量的原酸酯表明,它首先形成,但强AgOTf路易斯酸能够促进重排形成β-D-半乳糖苷键。这些结果进一步揭示了脱武装糖基供体与被认为更易接近的羟基之间明显的不匹配情况。根据受体和活化条件所施加的电子因素,在某些情况下,瞬时不稳定的原酸酯形成可能解释了为什么这些供体似乎与最易接近的羟基不匹配,而这些羟基在其他情况下会被武装供体糖基化。