Moubachir H, Zaghba N, Benjelloun H, Bakhatar A, Yassine N
Service des maladies respiratoires, CHU Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Maroc.
Service des maladies respiratoires, CHU Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Maroc.
Rev Mal Respir. 2016 Nov;33(9):789-793. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2015.11.015. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
The management of a first episode of spontaneous pneumothorax is controversial and the best technique to be used as an initial intervention, aspiration or intercostal drainage, is still debated.
We present a retrospective case series during two and a half consecutive years describing the immediate management of spontaneous pneumothoraces, comparing aspiration versus thoracic drainage.
One hundred and thirty-three clinical files from patients with spontaneous pneumothoraces were analyzed (17 primary and 116 secondary). The pneumothoraces were of varying size and different etiologies. Patients were initially treated with simple aspiration in 68 cases, with an immediate success rate of 37.5%, intercostal drainage in 49 cases, and by rest alone in 16 cases.
In case of secondary pneumothorax, aspiration appeared to offer advantages as an initial strategy over intercostal drainage in terms of hospital stay (11 versus 22 days), and with significant effectiveness (37.5%).
首次自发性气胸的治疗存在争议,作为初始干预措施采用的最佳技术,即胸腔穿刺抽气或肋间引流,仍存在争议。
我们呈现了连续两年半的回顾性病例系列,描述了自发性气胸的即刻治疗,比较了胸腔穿刺抽气与胸腔引流。
分析了133例自发性气胸患者的临床资料(17例原发性和116例继发性)。气胸大小各异,病因不同。68例患者最初接受单纯胸腔穿刺抽气治疗,即刻成功率为37.5%;49例接受肋间引流;16例仅通过休息治疗。
对于继发性气胸,在住院时间方面(11天对22天),胸腔穿刺抽气作为初始策略似乎比肋间引流更具优势,且具有显著疗效(37.5%)。