• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人复杂输尿管的一种新选择:无需借助4.5F半硬性输尿管镜通过球囊或支架扩张输尿管

A New Alternative for Difficult Ureter in Adult Patients: No Need to Dilate Ureter via a Balloon or a Stent with the Aid of 4.5F Semirigid Ureteroscope.

作者信息

Söylemez Haluk, Yıldırım Kadir, Utangac Mehmet Mazhar, Aydoğan Tahsin Batuhan, Ezer Mehmet, Atar Murat

机构信息

1 Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hacettepe , Ankara, Turkey .

2 Department of Urology, Silvan State Hospital , Diyarbakır, Turkey .

出版信息

J Endourol. 2016 Jun;30(6):650-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0118. Epub 2016 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0118
PMID:27021841
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectivity of 4.5F ultrathin ureteroscope (UT-URS) without any need for active or passive dilation in the treatment of adult patient population in whom ureteral orifices cannot be engaged using conventional URS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among a total of 512 adult patients who had undergone URS between April 2012 and November 2015 in our department for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, 43 (8.4%) patients required ureteral dilation because we could not engage ureteral orifice. In adult patients in whom we could not engage ureteral orifice with 7.5F and 8F semirigid URS, we tried to complete the operation using 4.5F UT-URS without resorting to dilation. Age and gender of the patients, indication for operation, stone size, location, operative times, laterality of stone(s), stone-free rates, length of hospital stay, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age of the patients was 34.5 ± 11.2 (21-66) years. The patients had undergone operations for ureteral stone (n = 39), unexplained hydronephrosis (n = 2), and ureteral stenosis (n = 2). Mean stone size was 8.2 ± 2.3 (4-18) mm. Mean operative time was 64.2 ± 13.5 minutes. In 37 of 39 patients, a complete stone-free rate (94.8%) was achieved. Mean length of hospital stay was 8.9 ± 5.8 hours.

CONCLUSION

It has been demonstrated that in an adult patient population in whom ureteral orifices cannot be engaged using conventional URS, ureteral access could be achieved with 4.5F UT-URS without any need for dilation. At the same time, use of 4.5F UT-URS resulted in an acceptable treatment success and lower complication rates in most of these patients without the need for a second session.

摘要

目的

探讨无需主动或被动扩张的4.5F超薄输尿管镜(UT - URS)在治疗成年患者中,对于使用传统输尿管镜无法找到输尿管口的有效性。

材料与方法

2012年4月至2015年11月间,在我科因诊断或治疗目的接受输尿管镜检查的512例成年患者中,43例(8.4%)因无法找到输尿管口而需要输尿管扩张。对于使用7.5F和8F半硬性输尿管镜无法找到输尿管口的成年患者,我们尝试使用4.5F UT - URS完成手术而不进行扩张。记录患者的年龄、性别、手术指征、结石大小、位置、手术时间、结石侧别、结石清除率、住院时间和并发症情况。

结果

患者的平均年龄为34.5±11.2(21 - 66)岁。患者接受手术的原因包括输尿管结石(n = 39)、不明原因肾积水(n = 2)和输尿管狭窄(n = 2)。平均结石大小为8.2±2.3(4 - 18)mm。平均手术时间为64.2±13.5分钟。39例患者中的37例(94.8%)实现了结石完全清除。平均住院时间为8.9±5.8小时。

结论

已证明在成年患者中,使用传统输尿管镜无法找到输尿管口时,4.5F UT - URS无需扩张即可实现输尿管通路。同时,使用4.5F UT - URS在大多数此类患者中取得了可接受的治疗成功率且并发症发生率较低,无需二次手术。

相似文献

1
A New Alternative for Difficult Ureter in Adult Patients: No Need to Dilate Ureter via a Balloon or a Stent with the Aid of 4.5F Semirigid Ureteroscope.成人复杂输尿管的一种新选择:无需借助4.5F半硬性输尿管镜通过球囊或支架扩张输尿管
J Endourol. 2016 Jun;30(6):650-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0118. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
2
Comparison of different ureteroscope sizes in treating ureteral calculi in adult patients.比较不同尺寸输尿管镜治疗成人输尿管结石的效果。
Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
3
The effectiveness of 4.5F ultrathin semirigid ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stones in prepubertal children: is there a need for any ureteral dilatation?4.5F 超微半刚性输尿管镜在处理青春期前儿童输尿管结石中的疗效:是否需要进行任何输尿管扩张?
Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):202-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Experience of retaining encrusted ureteral stents: URL by 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope can reduce the possibility of PCNL.经皮肾镜取石术相关经验:4.5/6.5F 输尿管镜下处理嵌顿性输尿管支架可降低 PCNL 发生率。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Aug;46(4):357-361. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0990-1. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
5
Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy Should Not Be the First Option for Proximal Ureteral Stones in Children.半硬性输尿管镜检查不应作为儿童近端输尿管结石的首选方法。
J Endourol. 2018 Nov;32(11):1028-1032. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0925. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
6
A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy and Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteral Stones >2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗>2 cm上段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心经验
J Endourol. 2015 Nov;29(11):1248-52. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0791. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
7
Semirigid ureteroscopy of the proximal ureter can be aided by external lower-abdominal pressure.下腹部外部施压有助于对近端输尿管进行半硬性输尿管镜检查。
J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):342-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.342.
8
Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy as a primary modality for large proximal ureteral calculi: comparison to rigid ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术作为治疗大型近端输尿管结石的主要方式:与硬性输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术的比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):7-13. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0340. Epub 2010 Dec 29.
9
Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石(<20mm):一项配对对照研究
Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
10
Bilateral Same-Session Ureteroscopy for Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.双侧同期输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1169-1179. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0472. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Factors to Predict Difficult Ureter during Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.输尿管镜碎石术中预测输尿管困难的临床因素
Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Feb 2;2023:2584499. doi: 10.1155/2023/2584499. eCollection 2023.
2
Randomized comparison of 4.5/6 Fr versus 6/7.5 Fr ureteroscopes for laser lithotripsy of lower/middle ureteral calculi: towards optimization of efficacy and safety of semirigid ureteroscopy.4.5/6Fr 与 6/7.5Fr 输尿管镜用于治疗下/中输尿管结石的激光碎石术的随机比较:为优化半刚性输尿管镜的疗效和安全性而努力。
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3075-3081. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04173-2. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
3
Is the 4.5-F ureteroscope (Ultra-Thin) an alternative in the management of ureteric and renal pelvic stones?
4.5F超薄输尿管镜能否作为输尿管及肾盂结石治疗的替代方案?
Arab J Urol. 2018 Jun 21;16(4):429-434. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.04.006. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Prevention strategies for ureteral stricture following ureteroscopic lithotripsy.输尿管镜碎石术后输尿管狭窄的预防策略。
Asian J Urol. 2018 Apr;5(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
5
Experience of retaining encrusted ureteral stents: URL by 4.5/6.5F ureteroscope can reduce the possibility of PCNL.经皮肾镜取石术相关经验:4.5/6.5F 输尿管镜下处理嵌顿性输尿管支架可降低 PCNL 发生率。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Aug;46(4):357-361. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-0990-1. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
The Gachon University Ureteral Narrowing score: A comprehensive standardized system for predicting necessity of ureteral dilatation to treat proximal ureteral calculi.加图立大学输尿管狭窄评分:预测治疗近端输尿管结石是否需要输尿管扩张的综合标准化系统。
Investig Clin Urol. 2016 Jul;57(4):280-5. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.4.280. Epub 2016 Jul 5.