Schroeder C E, Tenke C E, Arezzo J C, Vaughan H G
Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461.
Brain Res. 1989 Jan 16;477(1-2):183-95. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91406-6.
Simultaneous recording of activity from multiple cortical laminae in alert monkeys, using multichannel electrodes, has been used to identify the intracranial generators of surface-recorded, visually evoked potentials (VEP) to stroboscopic flash. Beyond their clinical implications, these results offer an unique view of the timing and sequence of cortical visual processing in the alert monkey, including the somewhat surprising findings of an extremely short-latency response in lamina IVA, a contra- over ipsilateral latency advantage throughout lamina IV, and the lack of a consistent flash-evoked response in the major cortical recipient of the magnocellular system, lamina IVCa. The present study used similar techniques to examine flash-evoked activity in LGN and in optic tract, both to elucidate the role of the subcortical pathways in establishing this pattern, and to provide a parallel, detailed view of the timing of visual activity in LGN and optic tract in the alert monkey. Flash-evoked responses are robust in both parvo- and magnocellular laminae, but these responses differ along several dimensions: (1) parvocellular multiunit activity (MUA) is 1/4 to 1/2 the amplitude of magnocellular MUA; (2) oscillatory activity is higher in frequency and shorter in duration in parvo- than in magnocellular responses; (3) inhibitory processes appear less prominent and diverse in parvo- than in magnocellular activity; (4) mean onset latencies of MUA are longer in parvo- than in magnocellular laminae, but there is extensive overlap in these distributions. Latencies encountered in ipsilateral lamina 3, and at laminar borders dorsal to 3, group more clearly with those of the magnocellular laminae than with those of the other parvocellular laminae. As a result, in the parvocellular division as a whole, the average latency to ipsilateral stimulation is shorter than that to contralateral stimulation. The optic tract exhibits a dorsal-to-ventral progression of onset latency and oscillation frequency consistent with a dorsal/ventral segregation of the inputs to parvo- and magnocellular layers. Comparison of optic tract and LGN data reveals that while many LGN response characteristics are initiated in the retina, significant modification of retinal output occurs at LGN. The techniques used here permit a particularly sensitive and reliable assessment of the timing and distribution of visual responses in the optic tract and LGN of alert monkeys. Our data support the view that in the alert monkey, the surface-VEP to passive, binocular flash primarily reflects activation of parvocellular thalamorecipient laminae of Area 17.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
使用多通道电极同时记录清醒猴子多个皮质层的活动,已被用于识别表面记录的、由频闪闪光诱发的视觉诱发电位(VEP)的颅内发生器。除了其临床意义外,这些结果还提供了清醒猴子皮质视觉处理的时间和顺序的独特视角,包括在IVA层中出现的极短潜伏期反应这一有些令人惊讶的发现、在整个IV层中对侧潜伏期优于同侧潜伏期,以及在大细胞系统的主要皮质接受区IVCa层中缺乏一致的闪光诱发反应。本研究使用类似技术检查外侧膝状体(LGN)和视束中的闪光诱发活动,以阐明皮质下通路在建立这种模式中的作用,并提供清醒猴子LGN和视束中视觉活动时间的平行、详细视图。闪光诱发反应在小细胞层和大细胞层中都很强烈,但这些反应在几个方面有所不同:(1)小细胞多单位活动(MUA)的幅度是大细胞MUA的1/4到1/2;(2)小细胞反应中的振荡活动频率更高、持续时间更短;(3)小细胞活动中的抑制过程不如大细胞活动中突出和多样;(4)MUA的平均起始潜伏期在小细胞层中比在大细胞层中更长,但这些分布有广泛重叠。同侧3层以及3层背侧的层边界处遇到的潜伏期,与大细胞层的潜伏期比与其他小细胞层的潜伏期分组更清晰。因此,在整个小细胞分区中,同侧刺激的平均潜伏期短于对侧刺激的平均潜伏期。视束表现出起始潜伏期和振荡频率从背侧到腹侧的进展,这与小细胞层和大细胞层输入的背侧/腹侧分离一致。视束和LGN数据的比较表明,虽然许多LGN反应特征在视网膜中启动,但视网膜输出在LGN处发生了显著改变。这里使用的技术允许对清醒猴子视束和LGN中视觉反应的时间和分布进行特别敏感和可靠的评估。我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即在清醒猴子中,对被动双眼闪光的表面VEP主要反映了17区小细胞丘脑接受层的激活。(摘要截断于400字)