Naylor Simon
Isis. 2015 Dec;106(4):771-97. doi: 10.1086/684641.
This essay contributes to debates about the relationship between science and the military by examining the British Admiralty's participation in meteorological projects in the first half of the nineteenth century. It focuses on attempts to transform Royal Navy log books into standardized meteorological registers that would be of use to both science and the state. The essay begins with a discussion of Admiralty Hydrographer Francis Beaufort, who promoted the use of standardized systems for the observation of the weather at sea. It then examines the application of ships' logs to the science of storms. The essay focuses on the Army engineer William Reid, who studied hurricanes while stationed in Barbados and Bermuda. Reid was instrumental in persuading the Admiralty to implement a naval meteorological policy, something the Admiralty Hydrographer had struggled to achieve. The essay uses the reception and adoption of work on storms at sea to reflect on the means and ends of maritime meteorology in the mid-nineteenth century.
本文通过考察英国海军部在19世纪上半叶对气象项目的参与,为有关科学与军事之间关系的辩论做出了贡献。它聚焦于将皇家海军航海日志转变为标准化气象记录册的尝试,这些记录册对科学和国家都有用处。文章开篇讨论了海军水文地理学家弗朗西斯·蒲福,他推动了海上天气观测标准化系统的使用。接着考察了航海日志在风暴科学中的应用。文章重点关注陆军工程师威廉·里德,他在驻扎于巴巴多斯和百慕大期间研究飓风。里德在说服海军部实施一项海军气象政策方面发挥了重要作用,而这是海军水文地理学家一直努力却未能实现的。本文利用对海上风暴研究成果的接受和采用情况,来反思19世纪中叶海洋气象学的手段和目的。