Suppr超能文献

聚焦形成性评价:构建旨在促进学生成长与发展的评估体系。

Focusing on the Formative: Building an Assessment System Aimed at Student Growth and Development.

作者信息

Konopasek Lyuba, Norcini John, Krupat Edward

机构信息

L. Konopasek is designated institutional official, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and associate professor of pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. J. Norcini is president and chief executive officer, Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. E. Krupat is director, Center for Evaluation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2016 Nov;91(11):1492-1497. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001171.

Abstract

This Perspective addresses the need for an integrated system of formative and summative assessment in undergraduate medical education with a focus on the formative. While acknowledging the importance of summative assessment, which asks whether trainees have met criteria for progression, the authors propose that a formatively focused assessment system can best accomplish a central task of competency-based medical education: transmitting feedback to learners in a format and a manner that will help them to improve, develop, and grow. Formative assessment should not be seen as a set of singular events but, rather, as a process that is organized and integrated over time, much like the cycle of quality improvement in medicine. To justify this position, the authors discuss its conceptual underpinnings and rationale, including the need to prepare learners for the formatively focused assessment system of graduate medical education. Next, the authors identify assessment strategies that could be employed, as well as the characteristics of an institutional culture and the learner-teacher relationship necessary for a learner-centered, improvement-focused assessment system to succeed. Finally, an infrastructure for such a system is proposed. This consists of a foundation of well-articulated and disseminated milestones for achievement and four pillars: faculty development, learner development, longitudinal academic advising and coaching, and documentation of developing competence. The authors conclude by suggesting that the guidelines proposed are analogous to the principles of continuity and coordination of care, so much valued in the world of medicine yet often overlooked in the world of education.

摘要

本观点论述了本科医学教育中形成性评估与总结性评估综合体系的必要性,重点在于形成性评估。在承认总结性评估重要性(其旨在考查学员是否达到进阶标准)的同时,作者们提出,以形成性评估为重点的评估体系能够最好地完成基于胜任力的医学教育的一项核心任务:以有助于学员改进、发展和成长的形式及方式向他们传递反馈。形成性评估不应被视为一系列孤立的事件,而应被视为一个随着时间推移而组织和整合的过程,这与医学质量改进的循环颇为相似。为证明这一立场的合理性,作者们讨论了其概念基础和基本原理,包括让学员为毕业后医学教育中以形成性评估为重点的评估体系做好准备的必要性。接下来,作者们确定了可以采用的评估策略,以及以学员为中心、以改进为重点的评估体系取得成功所需的机构文化特征和师生关系。最后,提出了这样一个体系的基础设施。这包括明确阐述并广泛传播的成就里程碑基础以及四大支柱:教师发展、学员发展、纵向学业指导与辅导,以及能力发展记录。作者们在结论中指出,所提出的指导方针类似于医疗领域极为重视但在教育领域常常被忽视的连续护理和协调护理原则。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验