Cameron David S, Bertenshaw Emma J, Sheeran Paschal
a Department of Psychology , University of Sheffield , Sheffield S10 2TP , UK.
b Unilever Research & Development , Colworth Science Park , Sharnbrook, Bedford MK44 1LQ , UK.
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):345-65. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.923164. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
Several reviews suggest that positive affect is associated with improved longevity, fewer physical symptoms, and biological indicators of good health. It is possible that positive affect could influence these outcomes by promoting healthful cognitions and behaviours. The present review identified conceptual pathways from positive affect to health cognitions and behaviour, and used random effects meta-analysis to quantify the impact of positive affect inductions (versus neutral affect conditions) on these outcomes. Literature searches located 54 independent tests that could be included in the review. Across all studies, the findings revealed no reliable effects on intentions (d+ = -.12, 95% CI = -.32 to .08, k = 15) or behaviour (d+ = .15, 95% CI = -.03 to .33, k = 23). There were four reliable effects involving specific cognitions and behaviours, but little clear evidence for generalised benefits or adverse effects of positive emotions on health-related cognitions or actions. Conclusions must be cautious given the paucity of tests available for analysis. The review offers suggestions about research designs that might profitably be deployed in future studies, and calls for additional tests of the impact of discrete positive emotions on health cognitions and behaviour.
多项综述表明,积极情绪与更长的寿命、更少的身体症状以及良好健康的生物学指标相关。积极情绪有可能通过促进健康的认知和行为来影响这些结果。本综述确定了从积极情绪到健康认知和行为的概念路径,并使用随机效应荟萃分析来量化积极情绪诱导(相对于中性情绪条件)对这些结果的影响。文献检索找到了54项可纳入本综述的独立测试。在所有研究中,结果显示对意图没有可靠影响(d+ = -0.12,95%置信区间 = -0.32至0.08,k = 15)或行为没有可靠影响(d+ = 0.15,95%置信区间 = -0.03至0.33,k = 23)。有四项涉及特定认知和行为的可靠影响,但几乎没有明确证据表明积极情绪对健康相关认知或行动有普遍益处或不利影响。鉴于可供分析的测试数量稀少,得出结论时必须谨慎。本综述提供了关于可在未来研究中有益采用的研究设计的建议,并呼吁对离散积极情绪对健康认知和行为的影响进行更多测试。