Tilden Virginia P, Eckstrom Elizabeth, Dieckmann Nathan F
a School of Nursing , Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
b Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine , Oregon Health & Science University , Portland , Oregon , USA.
J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):288-94. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1137891. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
As interprofessional education moves from classroom to clinical settings, assessing clinical training sites for a high level of "teamness" to ensure optimal learning environments is critical but often problematic ahead of student placement. We developed a tool (Assessment for Collaborative Environments, or ACE), suitable for a range of clinical settings and health professionals, that allows rapid assessment of a clinical practice's teamwork qualities. We collected evidence of tool validity including content, response process, internal structure, and convergent validity. Expert review and cognitive interviews allowed reduction of the initial 30-item tool to 15 items (the ACE-15). Data from 192 respondents from 17 clinical professions and varied clinical settings (inpatient, ambulatory, urban, and rural) were used for factor analysis, which resulted in a single factor solution. Internal consistency reliability Cronbach's alpha was high at 0.91. Subgroup analysis of 121 respondents grouped by their clinical teams (n = 16 teams) showed a wide range of intra-team agreement. Data from a subsequent sample of 54 clinicians who completed the ACE-15 and a measure of team cohesion indicated convergent validity, with a correlation of the tools at r = 0.81. We conclude that the ACE-15 has acceptable psychometric properties and promising utility for assessing interprofessional teamness in clinical training sites that are settings for learners, and, in addition may be useful for team development.
随着跨专业教育从课堂转向临床环境,在学生实习前评估临床培训场所的高度“团队协作性”以确保最佳学习环境至关重要,但往往存在问题。我们开发了一种工具(协作环境评估工具,即ACE),适用于一系列临床环境和卫生专业人员,可快速评估临床实践的团队合作质量。我们收集了工具有效性的证据,包括内容、反应过程、内部结构和收敛效度。专家评审和认知访谈使最初的30项工具减少到15项(ACE-15)。来自17个临床专业和不同临床环境(住院、门诊、城市和农村)的192名受访者的数据用于因子分析,结果得到一个单因子解。内部一致性信度Cronbach's alpha很高,为0.91。对按临床团队分组的121名受访者(n = 16个团队)进行的亚组分析显示,团队内部的一致性范围很广。来自随后54名完成ACE-15的临床医生样本的数据和一项团队凝聚力测量表明具有收敛效度,工具之间的相关性为r = 0.81。我们得出结论,ACE-15具有可接受的心理测量特性,在评估作为学习者实习场所的临床培训场所的跨专业团队协作性方面具有良好的效用,此外,可能对团队发展也有用。