Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews.
作者信息
Jakobsen Janus C, Wetterslev Jørn, Lange Theis, Gluud Christian
机构信息
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 18;3(3):ED000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000111.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 18;3(3):ED000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000111.
2
An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis.
Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 29;3:109. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-109.
3
Advantages of individual patient data analysis in systematic reviews.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Mar;63(3):233-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.005.
4
Innovation and cross-fertilization in systematic reviews and meta-analysis: The influence of women investigators.
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Sep;6(3):277-83. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1147. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
5
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
EuroIntervention. 2009 Aug;5(3):289-91.
6
Introducing conceptual and analytical clarity on dimensions of complexity in systematic reviews of complex interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;66(11):1202-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.004.
7
A decade of individual participant data meta-analyses: A review of current practice.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
8
What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Nov;36(10):1198-1201. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw172.
9
We know less than we should about methods of meta-analysis.
Res Synth Methods. 2015 Sep;6(3):287-9. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1146. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: studies of studies.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 May-Jun;35(3):258-65. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000319122.76112.23.
引用本文的文献
1
Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Squeezing ETHOS Dry for Clinical Evidence at Risk of Type I Error.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):526-527. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202410-1922LE.
2
Higher versus lower fractions of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 13;9(9):CD012631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012631.pub3.
3
Tramadol for chronic pain in adults: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 22;12(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02307-0.
4
The difference between shorter- versus longer-term psychotherapy for adult mental health disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04895-6.
5
Effect of dexmedetomidine on liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 22;14:1188011. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1188011. eCollection 2023.
6
Eversion technique versus traditional carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis.
Surg Open Sci. 2023 May 23;13:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.05.003. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Prophylactic platelet transfusions versus no prophylaxis in hospitalized patients with thrombocytopenia: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Transfusion. 2022 Oct;62(10):2117-2136. doi: 10.1111/trf.17064. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
8
Acetate- versus lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Aug;66(7):782-794. doi: 10.1111/aas.14076. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
Interventions for altering blood pressure in people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 17;11(11):CD013096. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013096.pub2.
10
Comment on "Pharmacological Treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
CNS Drugs. 2021 Dec;35(12):1333-1334. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00872-3. Epub 2021 Nov 7.
本文引用的文献
1
Abstracts of the 4th Meeting of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative.
Trials. 2015;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):M1-P36. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-16-s1-m1. Epub 2015 May 29.
2
Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Nov 21;14:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-120.
3
The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance - a five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 4;14:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-34.
4
Meta-analysis of clinical trial safety data in a drug development program: answers to frequently asked questions.
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):20-31. doi: 10.1177/1740774512465495. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
5
Obtaining evidence by a single well-powered trial or several modestly powered trials.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):538-52. doi: 10.1177/0962280212461098. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
6
Why the P-value culture is bad and confidence intervals a better alternative.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Aug;20(8):805-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
7
Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews of anaesthesia interventions: a quantification and comparison between Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028422. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
8
Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Dec;42(4):497-507. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.003.
9
How to obtain the confidence interval from a P value.
BMJ. 2011 Aug 8;343:d2090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2090.
10
Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Dec 30;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-86.
Zotero 插件