Matsevych Oleh Y, Koto Modise Z, Motilall Sooraj R, Kumar Neha
From the Department of Surgery, Sefako Makgatho Health Science University, Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Aug;81(2):307-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001064.
Organ evisceration after penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT) carries a high rate of significant intra-abdominal injuries. There is uniform agreement that organ evisceration warrants immediate laparotomy. Nonoperative management of stable asymptomatic patients with evisceration is associated with a high failure rate. Most authors exclude patients with organ evisceration from laparoscopic management.The aims of this study were to determine the significance of organ evisceration in stable patients with PAT and to assess the feasibility of laparoscopic management of this group.
Intraoperative findings, performed surgery, and complications in stable patients who underwent laparoscopy for PAT and evisceration between January 2012 and December 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. All unstable patients underwent laparotomy and were excluded.
A total of 189 stable patients were treated with laparoscopy for PAT. Thirty-nine patients (20.6%) had organ evisceration; 37 patients had stab wounds and 2 patients had gunshot wounds. Fifteen patients had bowel evisceration and 24 had omental evisceration. In total, 25 patients (64%) had significant injuries (colon, small bowel, etc.) and required therapeutic laparoscopy. The rate of therapeutic laparoscopy was 73% in patients with bowel evisceration and 58% in patients with omental evisceration. This difference was not statistically significant. The most commonly injured organ was the small bowel. The small-bowel repair, resection, and anastomosis were the most commonly performed procedures. We did not have any missed injuries. There were neither conversions nor significant complications in the postoperative period. Fourteen patients avoided nontherapeutic laparotomy.
Organ evisceration in stable patients with PAT is associated with a high rate of significant intra-abdominal injuries and mandates abdominal exploration. Laparoscopic management is feasible, has a high accuracy in identifying intra-abdominal injuries, provides all benefits of minimal invasive surgery, and avoids nontherapeutic laparotomy.
Therapeutic study, level V.
穿透性腹部创伤(PAT)后脏器脱出伴有严重腹腔内损伤的发生率很高。人们一致认为脏器脱出需要立即进行剖腹手术。对稳定无症状的脏器脱出患者进行非手术治疗失败率很高。大多数作者将脏器脱出患者排除在腹腔镜治疗之外。本研究的目的是确定脏器脱出在稳定的PAT患者中的意义,并评估该组患者腹腔镜治疗的可行性。
回顾性分析2012年1月至2014年12月期间因PAT和脏器脱出接受腹腔镜手术的稳定患者的术中发现、实施的手术及并发症。所有不稳定患者均接受剖腹手术并被排除。
共有189例稳定患者因PAT接受了腹腔镜治疗。39例患者(20.6%)出现脏器脱出;37例为刺伤,2例为枪伤。15例患者肠管脱出,24例患者网膜脱出。总共有25例患者(64%)有严重损伤(结肠、小肠等),需要进行治疗性腹腔镜手术。肠管脱出患者的治疗性腹腔镜手术率为73%,网膜脱出患者为58%。这种差异无统计学意义。最常受伤的器官是小肠。小肠修复、切除和吻合是最常实施的手术。我们没有漏诊任何损伤。术后既没有中转开腹,也没有出现严重并发症。14例患者避免了非治疗性剖腹手术。
稳定的PAT患者出现脏器脱出与严重腹腔内损伤的高发生率相关,需要进行腹部探查。腹腔镜治疗是可行的,在识别腹腔内损伤方面具有很高的准确性,具有微创手术的所有优点,并且避免了非治疗性剖腹手术。
治疗性研究,V级。