Wang Bo, Franklin Jessica M, Eddings Wesley, Landon Joan, Kesselheim Aaron S
Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152195. eCollection 2016.
Following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval, many drugs are prescribed for non-FDA-approved ("off-label") uses. If substantial evidence supports the efficacy and safety of off-label indications, manufacturers can pursue formal FDA approval through supplemental new drug applications (sNDAs). We evaluated the effect of FDA determinations on pediatric sNDAs for antipsychotic drugs on prescribing of these products in children.
Retrospective, segmented time-series analysis using new prescription claims during 2003-2012 for three atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone). FDA approved the sNDAs for pediatric use of olanzapine and quetiapine in December 2009, but did not approve the sNDA for pediatric use of ziprasidone.
During the months before FDA approval of its pediatric sNDA, new prescriptions of olanzapine decreased for both children and adults. After FDA approval, the increase in prescribing trends was similar for both age groups (P = 0.47 for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder; P = 0.37 for other indications). Comparable decreases in use of quetiapine were observed between pediatrics and adults following FDA approval of its pediatric sNDA (P = 0.88; P = 0.63). Prescribing of ziprasidone decreased similarly for pediatric and adult patients after FDA non-approval of its pediatric sNDA (P = 0.61; P = 0.79).
The FDA's sNDA determinations relating to use of antipsychotics in children did not result in changes in use that favored the approved sNDAs and disfavored the unapproved sNDA. Improved communication may help translate the agency's expert judgments to clinical practice.
在美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准后,许多药物被用于未经FDA批准的(“未标明的”)用途。如果有大量证据支持未标明适应症的有效性和安全性,制造商可以通过补充新药申请(sNDA)寻求FDA的正式批准。我们评估了FDA的决定对儿童抗精神病药物的儿科sNDA在儿童中这些产品处方方面的影响。
使用2003年至2012年期间三种非典型抗精神病药物(奥氮平、喹硫平、齐拉西酮)的新处方索赔进行回顾性分段时间序列分析。FDA于2009年12月批准了奥氮平和喹硫平用于儿科的sNDA,但未批准齐拉西酮用于儿科的sNDA。
在FDA批准其儿科sNDA之前的几个月里,奥氮平在儿童和成人中的新处方量均下降。FDA批准后,两个年龄组的处方增加趋势相似(精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的P = 0.47;其他适应症的P = 0.37)。在FDA批准其儿科sNDA后,儿科和成人中喹硫平的使用量出现了类似的下降(P = 0.88;P = 0.63)。在FDA未批准齐拉西酮用于儿科的sNDA后,儿科和成人患者中齐拉西酮的处方量下降情况相似(P = 0.61;P = 0.79)。
FDA关于儿童使用抗精神病药物的sNDA决定并未导致使用情况的变化有利于已批准的sNDA而不利于未批准的sNDA。改善沟通可能有助于将该机构的专家判断转化为临床实践。