• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品控制委员会的积压工作以及快速审查系统对南非获取具有公共卫生重要性的创新型、新型仿制药和生物类似药的影响。

The impact of the Medicines Control Council backlog and fast-track review system on access to innovative and new generic and biosimilar medicines of public health importance in South Africa.

作者信息

Leng Henry Martin John, Pollock Allyson M, Sanders David

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2016 Mar 17;106(4):43-6. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i4.10237.

DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i4.10237
PMID:27032846
Abstract

The fast-track registration policy of the South African National Department of Health allows for rapid registration of new medicines of public health importance and of all medicines on the Essential Medicines List, most of which are generics. No limit is placed on the number of generic brands of a medicine that can be submitted for fast-track registration. This, together with resource constraints at the regulator, may delay access to important new medicines, new fixed-dose combinations of critical medicines or affordable versions of biological medicines (biosimilars). One reason for not limiting the number of fast-track generic applications was to promote price competition among generic brands. We found this not to be valid, since market share correlated poorly with price. Generic brands with high market share were, mostly, those that were registered first. We propose that the number of generic brands accepted for fast-tracking be limited to not more than seven per medicine.

摘要

南非国家卫生部的快速注册政策允许对具有公共卫生重要性的新药以及基本药物清单上的所有药物进行快速注册,其中大多数为仿制药。对于可提交快速注册的一种药物的仿制药品牌数量没有限制。这一点,再加上监管机构的资源限制,可能会延迟重要新药、关键药物的新固定剂量组合或生物药物(生物类似药)的可负担版本的获取。不限制快速通道仿制药申请数量的一个原因是促进仿制药品牌之间的价格竞争。我们发现这并不成立,因为市场份额与价格之间的相关性很差。市场份额高的仿制药品牌大多是那些最先注册的品牌。我们建议,每种药物接受快速通道注册的仿制药品牌数量应限制在不超过七个。

相似文献

1
The impact of the Medicines Control Council backlog and fast-track review system on access to innovative and new generic and biosimilar medicines of public health importance in South Africa.药品控制委员会的积压工作以及快速审查系统对南非获取具有公共卫生重要性的创新型、新型仿制药和生物类似药的影响。
S Afr Med J. 2016 Mar 17;106(4):43-6. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v106i4.10237.
2
What are biosimilars and are they important?生物类似药是什么,它们重要吗?
Drug Ther Bull. 2013 May;51(5):57-60. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2013.5.0181.
3
Current Japanese Regulatory Systems for Generics and Biosimilars.日本现行的仿制药和生物类似药监管体系。
J Pharm Sci. 2018 Mar;107(3):785-787. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.10.040. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
4
Sharing, samples, and generics: an antitrust framework.共享、样本与仿制药:一种反垄断框架
Cornell Law Rev. 2017;103(1):1-64.
5
Biosimilar competition in the United States: statutory incentives, payers, and pharmacy benefit managers.美国的生物类似药竞争:法定激励措施、支付方及药品福利管理机构
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):294-301. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0482.
6
Pseudo-Generics in South Africa: A Price Comparison.南非的伪仿制药:价格比较
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 Sep;19:87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Joint 24th Medicines for Europe and 21st International Generic and Biosimilars Association (IGBA) Annual Conference (June 13-15, 2018 - Budapest, Hungary).欧洲药品协会与第21届国际仿制药和生物类似药协会(IGBA)联合年会(2018年6月13日至15日——匈牙利布达佩斯)。
Drugs Today (Barc). 2018 Aug;54(8):499-505. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.8.2866119.
8
[Can we transfer the mechanisms of the generics market to biosimilars?].我们能否将仿制药市场的机制应用于生物类似药?
Versicherungsmedizin. 2016 Dec 15;68(4):168-72.
9
Differences Between Managed Care and Fee-for-Service Medicaid in the Use of Generics for High-Rebate Drugs: The Cases of Insulin Glargine and Glatiramer.管理式医疗与按服务收费的医疗补助制度在高回扣药物使用仿制药方面的差异:以甘精胰岛素和格拉替雷为例。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Feb;26(2):154-159. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.2.154.
10
Biosimilars: How Can Payers Get Long-Term Savings?生物类似药:支付方如何实现长期节省?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jun;34(6):609-16. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0380-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulatory registration timelines of generic medicines in South Africa: Assessment of the performance of SAHPRA between 2011 and 2022.南非仿制药的监管注册时间表:2011年至2022年期间南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)的绩效评估
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 Mar 2;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00537-0.
2
The Implementation of a Risk-Based Assessment Approach by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)实施基于风险的评估方法。
Pharmaceut Med. 2023 Jan;37(1):71-91. doi: 10.1007/s40290-022-00452-w. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
3
Linking market authorizations of medicines with disease burden in South Africa.
将南非药品的市场授权与疾病负担联系起来。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2021 Apr 1;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40545-021-00314-x.