Unterrainer Marcus, Schweisthal Florian, Suchorska Bogdana, Wenter Vera, Schmid-Tannwald Christine, Fendler Wolfgang P, Schüller Ulrich, Bartenstein Peter, Tonn Jörg-Christian, Albert Nathalie L
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
J Nucl Med. 2016 Aug;57(8):1177-82. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.171033. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PET with O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) has gained increasing importance for glioma management. With regard to the occurrence of (18)F-FET-negative glioma, we investigated the value of (18)F-FET PET monitoring of primarily (18)F-FET-negative gliomas concerning the detection of progression and malignant transformation.
We included 31 patients (26 World Health Organization [WHO] grade II, 5 WHO grade III) with primarily (18)F-FET-negative glioma and available (18)F-FET PET follow-up. (18)F-FET PET analysis comprised maximal tumor-to-background ratio (TBRmax) and dynamic analysis of tumoral (18)F-FET uptake over time (increasing vs. decreasing) including minimal time to peak (TTPmin). PET findings were correlated with MRI and clinical findings of progression as well as histology of recurrent tumors.
Twenty-three of 31 patients experienced tumor progression (median progression-free survival, 41.7 mo). Fourteen of 23 patients showed tumoral (18)F-FET uptake concurrent to and 4 of 23 before MRI-derived or clinical signs of tumor progression; 2 of 23 patients presented signs of progression in MRI when no concomitant (18)F-FET PET was available, but subsequent follow-up PET was positive. In 3 of 23 patients, no (18)F-FET uptake was detected at tumor progression. Overall, 20 of 31 primarily (18)F-FET-negative glioma turned (18)F-FET-positive during the follow-up. At first occurrence of tumoral (18)F-FET uptake, TBRmax was significantly higher in patients with malignant transformation (11/20) than in those without malignant progression (3.2 ± 0.9 vs. 1.9 ± 0.5; P = 0.001), resulting in a high detection rate for malignant transformation (for TBRmax > 2.46: sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 89%; negative predictive value, 80%; positive predictive value, 90%; and accuracy, 85%). Although static evaluation was superior to dynamic analysis for the detection of malignant transformation (for TTPmin ≤ 17.5 min: sensitivity, 73%; specificity, 67%; negative predictive value, 67%; positive predictive value, 73%; and accuracy, 70%), short TTPmin was associated with an early malignant transformation in the further disease course. Overall, 18 of 31 patients experienced malignant transformation; of these, 16 of 17 (94%) evaluable patients showed (18)F-FET uptake at the time of malignant transformation.
(18)F-FET PET monitoring with static and dynamic evaluation is useful even in primarily (18)F-FET-negative glioma, providing a high detection rate of both tumor progression and malignant transformation, partly before further signs of progression in MRI. Hence, (18)F-FET uptake indicating malignant transformation might influence the patient management.
使用O-(2-(18)F-氟乙基)-L-酪氨酸((18)F-FET)的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在胶质瘤管理中越来越重要。关于(18)F-FET阴性胶质瘤的发生,我们研究了(18)F-FET PET监测原发性(18)F-FET阴性胶质瘤在检测进展和恶性转化方面的价值。
我们纳入了31例原发性(18)F-FET阴性胶质瘤且有可用(18)F-FET PET随访资料的患者(26例世界卫生组织[WHO]二级,5例WHO三级)。(18)F-FET PET分析包括最大肿瘤与本底比值(TBRmax)以及肿瘤(18)F-FET摄取随时间的动态分析(增加与减少),包括达到峰值的最短时间(TTPmin)。PET检查结果与MRI、进展的临床检查结果以及复发性肿瘤的组织学检查结果相关联。
31例患者中有23例出现肿瘤进展(无进展生存期的中位数为41.7个月)。23例进展患者中有14例在MRI显示肿瘤进展或出现临床体征之前以及23例中有4例同时出现肿瘤(18)F-FET摄取;23例患者中有2例在没有同步(18)F-FET PET检查时MRI出现进展体征,但随后的随访PET检查呈阳性。23例进展患者中有3例在肿瘤进展时未检测到(18)F-FET摄取。总体而言,31例原发性(18)F-FET阴性胶质瘤中有20例在随访期间变为(18)F-FET阳性。在首次出现肿瘤(18)F-FET摄取时,发生恶性转化的患者(11/20)的TBRmax显著高于未发生恶性进展的患者(分别为3.2±0.9和1.9±0.5;P = 0.001),导致恶性转化的检测率较高(TBRmax>2.46时:敏感性为82%;特异性为89%;阴性预测值为80%;阳性预测值为90%;准确性为85%)。虽然静态评估在检测恶性转化方面优于动态分析(TTPmin≤17.5分钟时:敏感性为73%;特异性为67%;阴性预测值为67%;阳性预测值为73%;准确性为70%),但TTPmin较短与疾病进一步发展过程中的早期恶性转化相关。总体而言,31例患者中有18例发生恶性转化;其中,17例可评估患者中有16例(94%)在发生恶性转化时出现(18)F-FET摄取。
即使对于原发性(18)F-FET阴性胶质瘤,采用静态和动态评估的(18)F-FET PET监测也很有用,对肿瘤进展和恶性转化均有较高的检测率,部分在MRI出现进一步进展迹象之前。因此,提示恶性转化的(18)F-FET摄取可能会影响患者的管理。