Departments of 1 Maxillo-Facial Surgery and.
Neurophysiopathology Service, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia; and.
J Neurosurg. 2017 Jan;126(1):312-318. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS14601. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
OBJECTIVE Facial palsy is a well-known functional and esthetic problem that bothers most patients and affects their social relationships. When the time between the onset of paralysis and patient presentation is less than 18 months and the proximal stump of the injured facial nerve is not available, another nerve must be anastomosed to the facial nerve to reactivate its function. The masseteric nerve has recently gained popularity over the classic hypoglossus nerve as a new motor source because of its lower associated morbidity rate and the relative ease with which the patient can activate it. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of masseteric-facial nerve neurorrhaphy for early facial reanimation. METHODS Thirty-four consecutive patients (21 females, 13 males) with early unilateral facial paralysis underwent masseteric-facial nerve neurorrhaphy in which an interpositional nerve graft of the great auricular or sural nerve was placed. The time between the onset of paralysis and surgery ranged from 2 to 18 months (mean 13.3 months). Electromyography revealed mimetic muscle fibrillations in all the patients. Before surgery, all patients had House-Brackmann Grade VI facial nerve dysfunction. Twelve months after the onset of postoperative facial nerve reactivation, each patient underwent a clinical examination using the modified House-Brackmann grading scale as a guide. RESULTS Overall, 91.2% of the patients experienced facial nerve function reactivation. Facial recovery began within 2-12 months (mean 6.3 months) with the restoration of facial symmetry at rest. According to the modified House-Brackmann grading scale, 5.9% of the patients had Grade I function, 61.8% Grade II, 20.6% Grade III, 2.9% Grade V, and 8.8% Grade VI. The morbidity rate was low; none of the patients could feel the loss of masseteric nerve function. There were only a few complications, including 1 case of postoperative bleeding (2.9%) and 2 local infections (5.9%), and a few patients complained about partial loss of sensitivity of the earlobe or a small area of the ankle and foot, depending on whether great auricular or sural nerves were harvested. CONCLUSIONS The surgical technique described here seems to be efficient for the early treatment of facial paralysis and results in very little morbidity.
面瘫是一种常见的功能和美容问题,困扰着大多数患者,并影响他们的社交关系。当面瘫发生到就诊的时间少于 18 个月,且损伤的面神经近端残端不可用时,必须将另一条神经吻合到面神经以恢复其功能。由于其较低的相关发病率和患者相对容易激活它,咀嚼肌神经最近作为一种新的运动源比经典舌下神经更受欢迎。本研究旨在评估咀嚼肌-面神经神经吻合术在早期面部再神经支配中的有效性。
34 例连续单侧面瘫患者(21 例女性,13 例男性)行咀嚼肌-面神经神经吻合术,其中使用耳大神经或腓肠神经的神经移植作为中间神经移植物。面瘫发生到手术的时间为 2-18 个月(平均 13.3 个月)。肌电图显示所有患者均有模拟肌肉纤维颤动。所有患者术前均为 House-Brackmann 面神经功能 VI 级。术后面神经再激活后 12 个月,每位患者均采用改良 House-Brackmann 分级量表进行临床检查。
总体而言,91.2%的患者出现面神经功能再激活。面神经恢复始于术后 2-12 个月(平均 6.3 个月),休息时面部对称恢复。根据改良 House-Brackmann 分级量表,5.9%的患者为 I 级功能,61.8%为 II 级,20.6%为 III 级,2.9%为 V 级,8.8%为 VI 级。发病率低;无患者感觉咀嚼肌神经功能丧失。仅有少数并发症,包括 1 例术后出血(2.9%)和 2 例局部感染(5.9%),少数患者抱怨耳垂或脚踝和足部的小面积部分感觉丧失,具体取决于使用的是耳大神经还是腓肠神经。
这里描述的手术技术似乎对面瘫的早期治疗有效,且发病率很低。