Masata Jaromir, Svabik Kamil, Zvara Karel, Hubka Petr, Toman Ales, Martan Alois
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Sciences, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a randomized two-arm study with a 1-year follow-up.
This single-centre randomized trial compared the objective and subjective cure rates of TVT-O and Ajust using objective criteria (cough test) and subjective criteria (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire short form, ICIQ-UI SF). The objective cure rate was defined as the number of patients with a negative cough stress test. Subjective cure was defined as no stress leakage of urine after surgery based on the ICIQ-UI SF. The primary outcome was to establish differences in objective and subjective cure rates between the TVT-O and Ajust groups. We also compared postoperative pain profiles using a visual analogue scale (VAS), improvement in quality of life using the ICIQ- UI SF and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, and overall satisfaction with the surgical procedure using a VAS and a five-item Likert scale. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years, signed informed consent, and urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Following a power calculation, 50 patients were enrolled into each group (Ajust and TVT-O).
The mean follow-up after surgery was 445 days (SD 157.6 days) in the TVT-O group and 451.8 days (SD 127.6 days) in the Ajust group (p = 76.6 %). At 1 year, 47 patients were evaluated in the TVT-O group and 49 in the Ajust group. No differences in subjective cure rates or objective cure rates were observed. In the Ajust and TVT-O groups, the rates for no subjective stress leakage were 89.8 % and 91.5 %, respectively (p = 1.0, OR 1.22, 95 % CI 0.24 - 6.58), and the rates for a negative stress test were 89.8 % and 87.2 %, respectively (p = 0.76, OR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.17 - 3.32). In the Ajust group two patients reported de novo pain during sexual intercourse.
After a 1-year-follow-up, no significant differences were found with regard to subjective and objective outcomes between the single-incision tape Ajust and TVT-O.
本研究旨在通过一项为期1年随访的随机双臂研究,比较无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)和单切口无张力阴道吊带术(Ajust™)治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效。
这项单中心随机试验使用客观标准(咳嗽试验)和主观标准(国际尿失禁咨询委员会简表,ICIQ-UI SF)比较了TVT-O和Ajust的客观治愈率和主观治愈率。客观治愈率定义为咳嗽压力试验阴性的患者数量。主观治愈定义为根据ICIQ-UI SF,术后无压力性尿漏。主要结局是确定TVT-O组和Ajust组在客观和主观治愈率上的差异。我们还使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)比较了术后疼痛情况,使用ICIQ-UI SF和尿失禁生活质量问卷比较了生活质量的改善情况,并使用VAS和五项李克特量表比较了对手术的总体满意度。纳入标准为年龄超过18岁、签署知情同意书以及存在尿动力学压力性尿失禁。经过样本量计算,每组(Ajust组和TVT-O组)纳入50例患者。
TVT-O组术后平均随访时间为445天(标准差157.6天),Ajust组为451.8天(标准差127.6天)(p =76.6%)。1年后,TVT-O组评估了47例患者,Ajust组评估了49例患者。未观察到主观治愈率或客观治愈率的差异。在Ajust组和TVT-O组中,无主观压力性尿漏的发生率分别为89.8%和91.5%(p =1.0,OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.24 - 6.58),压力试验阴性的发生率分别为89.8%和87.2%(p =0.76,OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.17 - 3.32)。在Ajust组中,有两名患者报告性交时出现新发疼痛。
经过1年的随访,单切口吊带Ajust和TVT-O在主观和客观结局方面未发现显著差异。