• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可调单切口或经闭孔吊带治疗尿失禁术后疼痛:一项随机对照试验。

Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or transobturator sling for incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Departments of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology and Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reinier de Graaf, Delft, Isala, Zwolle, Amphia, Breda, and Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):27-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000604.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000604
PMID:25560100
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare postoperative pain scores and assess efficacy between an adjustable single-incision sling and a standard transobturator sling for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

This single-blinded randomized controlled trial involved 156 women with clinically proven SUI. Women were allocated to receive either an adjustable single-incision or a transobturator sling. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score on a visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were objective and subjective cure rates at 12 months, symptom bother scores, quality of life, and complications.

RESULTS

The mean pain score in the first week postoperatively was significantly lower at all time points in the adjustable single-incision sling group compared with the transobturator sling group. Maximum difference in pain score was reported on the evening of the day of surgery; median pain score was 1.0 (interquartile range 2.0) in the adjustable sling group and 3.0 (interquartile range 4.5) in the transobturator sling group (Mann Whitney U test P<.001). There was no statistical difference in analgesic use. The objective cure rates in the adjustable single-incision sling and in the transobturator sling group were 90.8% and 88.6% (P=.760), and the subjective cure rates were 77.2% and 72.9% (P=.577), respectively. No difference in the complication rate was found.

CONCLUSION

An adjustable single-incision sling for the treatment of SUI is associated with lower early postoperative pain scores but shows comparable cure rates with a transobturator at 12 months of follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register, http://www.trialregister.nl, NTR: 2558.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

摘要

目的

比较可调节单切口吊带术与标准经闭孔吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的术后疼痛评分和疗效。

方法

本单盲随机对照试验纳入了 156 例经临床证实患有 SUI 的女性。将女性患者分配接受可调节单切口吊带术或经闭孔吊带术。主要结局是术后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)的疼痛评分。次要结局是 12 个月时的客观和主观治愈率、症状困扰评分、生活质量和并发症。

结果

与经闭孔吊带组相比,可调节单切口吊带组在术后第一周的所有时间点的疼痛评分均显著降低。在手术当天晚上,疼痛评分的最大差异最大;可调节吊带组的中位疼痛评分为 1.0(四分位距 2.0),经闭孔吊带组为 3.0(四分位距 4.5)(Mann-Whitney U 检验,P<.001)。两组在使用镇痛药方面无统计学差异。可调节单切口吊带组和经闭孔吊带组的客观治愈率分别为 90.8%和 88.6%(P=.760),主观治愈率分别为 77.2%和 72.9%(P=.577)。两组并发症发生率无差异。

结论

可调节单切口吊带术治疗 SUI 与早期术后疼痛评分较低相关,但在 12 个月随访时与经闭孔吊带术相比,治愈率相当。

临床试验注册

荷兰临床试验注册处,http://www.trialregister.nl,NTR:2558。

证据水平

I。

相似文献

1
Postoperative pain after adjustable single-incision or transobturator sling for incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.可调单切口或经闭孔吊带治疗尿失禁术后疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):27-34. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000604.
2
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
3
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.压力性尿失禁女性经闭孔中尿道吊带与单切口吊带的前瞻性随机对照研究:1年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
4
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
5
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
6
Transobturator sling compared with single-incision mini-sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.经闭孔悬吊带与单切口迷你吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;123(3):553-561. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000148.
7
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
8
A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence.一项比较创新性单切口吊带与已确立的经闭孔吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照试验。
J Urol. 2011 Apr;185(4):1356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.083. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
9
Adjustable single-incision mini-slings (Ajust®) versus other slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.可调单切口迷你吊带(Ajust®)与其他吊带在女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗中的比较:有效性和并发症的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2018 May 18;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0357-0.
10
A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.压力性尿失禁女性单切口与传统经闭孔尿道中段吊带术的随机对照研究:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):871-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2898-z. Epub 2015 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Single-Incision Sling Placement on Female Sexual Function in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence.单切口吊带置入对压力性尿失禁女性性功能的影响
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06058-5.
2
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
3
Adjustable slings versus other surgical methods in female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
可调吊带与其他手术方法治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jul;34(7):1351-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05535-z. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT.单切口微型吊带与标准合成中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:SIMS RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(47):1-190. doi: 10.3310/BTSA6148.
5
Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.可调节微型吊带与传统中尿道吊带治疗女性尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验的3年随访
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1465-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04004-w. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
6
Adjustable single-incision mini-slings (Ajust®) versus other slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.可调单切口迷你吊带(Ajust®)与其他吊带在女性压力性尿失禁手术治疗中的比较:有效性和并发症的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2018 May 18;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0357-0.
7
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Multicentre randomized trial of the Ajust™ single-incision sling compared to the Align™ transobturator tape sling.Ajust™单切口吊带与Align™经闭孔带吊带的多中心随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jul;28(7):1041-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3221-3. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.压力性尿失禁女性经闭孔中尿道吊带与单切口吊带的前瞻性随机对照研究:1年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2. Epub 2015 Dec 2.