Raschke Gregor F, Meissner Winfried, Peisker Andre, Djedovic Gabriel, Rieger Ulrich, Guentsch Arndt, Porwit Daria, Dammeier Marta Gomez, Schultze-Mosgau Stefan
Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial & Plastic Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1809-0. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
Postoperative pain management is of highest interest for patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery including microvascular reconstructive surgery. Currently, there is a lack of information regarding process and outcome of postoperative pain management after microvascular reconstruction.
In a prospective clinical study, 31 adults were evaluated on the first postoperative day following microvascular reconstruction with a radial forearm flap using the standardized questionnaire of the Germany-wide project Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management (QUIPS). It enables a standardized assessment of patients' characteristics, pain parameters, outcome and pain therapy process parameters.
Pain management consisted predominately of premedication with midazolam, sufentanil and metamizol intraoperatively, piritramid in the intensive care unit and metamizol, tramadol and fentanyl patches on ward. Nineteen patients (61.3 %) showed inadequate pain management with pain levels ≥4. Among other significant relations, patients exhibiting an age below the median presented significant higher levels of pain under strain (p = .041) and maximum pain (p = .006) as well as rate of breathing (p = .009) and mood (p = .006) disturbance. Performance of pain counselling showed specific impact on pain under strain (p = .008), maximum pain (p = .004) and satisfaction with pain intensity (p = .001). Whether microvascular reconstruction was performed with primary or secondary intention or performance of a neck dissection did not show significant influence.
QUIPS helped us to adequately evaluate the procedure-specific quality of postoperative management following microvascular reconstruction with a radial forearm flap. It helped us to identify a surprisingly high amount of inadequate pain management. Postoperative pain levels seem to be primarily influenced by the performed reconstruction.
Establishment of a continuous and procedure-specific evaluation of postoperative pain levels should help to avoid inadequate pain management, which is widely prevalent according to the literature and our study. Preoperative pain counselling is essential and should be procedure specific to be its best.
术后疼痛管理是接受包括微血管重建手术在内的颌面外科手术患者最为关注的问题。目前,关于微血管重建术后疼痛管理的过程和结果缺乏相关信息。
在一项前瞻性临床研究中,对31名成年人在使用前臂桡侧皮瓣进行微血管重建术后的第一天,采用德国全国性项目“术后疼痛管理质量改进”(QUIPS)的标准化问卷进行评估。该问卷能够对患者特征、疼痛参数、结果及疼痛治疗过程参数进行标准化评估。
疼痛管理主要包括术中使用咪达唑仑、舒芬太尼和安乃近进行术前用药,在重症监护病房使用匹米诺定,以及在病房使用安乃近、曲马多和芬太尼透皮贴剂。19名患者(61.3%)的疼痛管理不充分,疼痛程度≥4。在其他显著关系中,年龄低于中位数的患者在应激状态下的疼痛程度(p = 0.041)、最大疼痛程度(p = 0.006)以及呼吸频率(p = 0.009)和情绪(p = 0.006)紊乱方面表现出显著更高的水平。进行疼痛咨询对应激状态下的疼痛(p = 0.008)、最大疼痛(p = 0.004)以及对疼痛强度的满意度(p = 0.001)有特定影响。微血管重建是一期还是二期进行,以及是否进行颈部清扫术均未显示出显著影响。
QUIPS有助于我们充分评估使用前臂桡侧皮瓣进行微血管重建术后特定手术的管理质量。它帮助我们识别出数量惊人的疼痛管理不充分情况。术后疼痛水平似乎主要受所进行的重建手术影响。
建立对术后疼痛水平的持续且特定手术的评估,应有助于避免疼痛管理不充分,根据文献和我们的研究,这种情况普遍存在。术前疼痛咨询至关重要,并且应该针对具体手术做到最佳。