Ahmed Zubair A, Faulkner Larry R
Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Adult Neurology, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Headache. 2016 May;56(5):871-877. doi: 10.1111/head.12822. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
This cross-sectional study reassesses the status of headache didactics and clinical training in adult neurology residency programs in the United States to determine if program directors and chief residents feel that current training in headache is adequate.
Headache is among the most common new complaints to both the neurology and primary care clinic and represents a significant economic burden. However, headache remains both under-diagnosed and under-treated. Of those who seek treatment only 28% report they are very satisfied with their management. One possible cause for dissatisfaction is inadequate education of treating physicians. Two studies in 2002 and 2005 that collectively surveyed all 125 adult neurology residency programs concluded that more evidence was needed to evaluate the adequacy of headache education in these programs. A survey of neurology residency department chairs and program directors in 2005 also evaluated the status of headache education in adult neurology training programs and concluded the same.
We surveyed 133 neurology residency program directors and 213 chief residents. Program directors and chief residents were asked about the amount of headache didactics, amount of clinical exposure to headache, perceived adequacy of current training and if plans existed to increase headache education through didactics or clinical exposure.
Seventy-two program directors (54%) and 117 chief residents (55%) responded. Twenty-six percent of programs reported a mandatory headache clinic. Of these, 35% of programs reported <2 weeks of clinic, 54% of programs reported 2-4 weeks, and 12% of programs reported > 4 weeks of clinic. Fifty-one percent of program directors felt more than 4 weeks of clinical exposure to headache was needed to adequately prepare neurology residents. Ninety-six percent of program directors surveyed believed their residents were adequately prepared to diagnose and treat headache disorders. Twenty-one percent had plans to increase didactic time and 26% planned to incorporate more clinical exposure.
Despite a modest increase in headache didactics in neurology residency programs over the last decade, many program directors and chief residents report that their programs do not include what they believe to be adequate educational experiences in headache. Although the overwhelming majority of neurology residency programs reported that residents were adequately prepared to diagnose and treat headache disorders, about a fourth of programs still felt the need to increase the amount of didactic and clinical exposure dedicated toward the management of headache disorders.
这项横断面研究重新评估了美国成人神经病学住院医师培训项目中头痛教学与临床培训的现状,以确定项目主任和总住院医师是否认为当前的头痛培训足够。
头痛是神经病学和初级保健诊所最常见的新就诊主诉之一,且造成了重大经济负担。然而,头痛仍然诊断不足且治疗不足。在寻求治疗的患者中,只有28%的人表示对治疗非常满意。治疗医生教育不足可能是导致不满的一个原因。2002年和2005年的两项研究对所有125个成人神经病学住院医师培训项目进行了综合调查,得出结论认为需要更多证据来评估这些项目中头痛教育的充分性。2005年对神经病学住院医师培训项目主任和项目负责人的一项调查也评估了成人神经病学培训项目中头痛教育的现状,并得出了相同结论。
我们对133名神经病学住院医师培训项目主任和213名总住院医师进行了调查。项目主任和总住院医师被问及头痛教学的时长、头痛临床接触的时长、对当前培训充分性的看法,以及是否有计划通过教学或临床接触增加头痛教育。
72名项目主任(54%)和117名总住院医师(55%)做出了回应。26%的项目设有强制性头痛门诊。其中,35%的项目报告门诊时长不到2周,54%的项目报告为2 - 4周,12%的项目报告超过4周。51%的项目主任认为,神经病学住院医师需要超过4周的头痛临床接触才能得到充分培训。96%接受调查的项目主任认为他们的住院医师有足够能力诊断和治疗头痛疾病。21%的人计划增加教学时间,26%的人计划增加更多临床接触。
尽管在过去十年中,神经病学住院医师培训项目中的头痛教学有所增加,但许多项目主任和总住院医师报告称,他们的项目并未提供他们认为足够的头痛教育经历。尽管绝大多数神经病学住院医师培训项目报告称住院医师有足够能力诊断和治疗头痛疾病,但仍有大约四分之一的项目认为有必要增加针对头痛疾病管理的教学和临床接触时长。