Suppr超能文献

血统很重要:父系血统的增长与消亡

Ancestry Matters: Patrilineage Growth and Extinction.

作者信息

Song Xi, Campbell Cameron D, Lee James Z

机构信息

University of California-Los Angeles.

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

出版信息

Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Jun;80(3):574-602. doi: 10.1177/0003122415576516. Epub 2015 May 31.

Abstract

Patrilineality, the organization of kinship, inheritance, and other key social processes based on patrilineal male descent, has been a salient feature of social organization in China and many other societies for centuries. Because continuity or growth of the patrilineage was the central focus of reproductive strategies in such societies, we introduce the number of patrilineal male descendants generations later as a stratification outcome. By reconstructing and analyzing 20,000 patrilineages in two prospective, multi-generational population databases from 18 and 19 century China, we show that patrilineages founded by high status males had higher growth rates for the next 150 years. The elevated growth rate of these patrilineages was due more to their having a lower probability of extinction at each point in time than to surviving patrilineal male descendants having larger numbers of sons on average. As a result, patrilineal male descendants of high status males account for a disproportionately large share of the male population in later generations. In China and elsewhere, patrilineal kin network characteristics influence individuals' life chances; thus effects of a male founder's characteristics on patrilineage size many generations later represent an indirect channel of status transmission that has not been considered previously.

摘要

父系继嗣制,即基于父系男性世系的亲属关系、继承及其他关键社会进程的组织形式,在数百年间一直是中国及许多其他社会中社会组织的一个显著特征。由于在这类社会中,父系家族的延续或壮大是生殖策略的核心关注点,我们将数代之后父系男性后裔的数量作为一种分层结果引入。通过对来自18世纪和19世纪中国的两个前瞻性、多代人口数据库中的20000个父系家族进行重建和分析,我们发现,由地位较高男性创立的父系家族在接下来的150年里有着更高的增长率。这些父系家族增长率的提高更多是因为它们在每个时间点灭绝的概率较低,而非存活下来的父系男性后裔平均生育的儿子数量更多。结果,地位较高男性的父系男性后裔在后代男性人口中所占比例极大。在中国及其他地方,父系亲属网络特征会影响个人的生活机遇;因此,男性创立者的特征对许多代之后父系家族规模的影响代表了一种此前未被考虑过的地位传递间接渠道。

相似文献

1
Ancestry Matters: Patrilineage Growth and Extinction.
Am Sociol Rev. 2015 Jun;80(3):574-602. doi: 10.1177/0003122415576516. Epub 2015 May 31.
2
Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20190005. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0005. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3
Kin preference and partner choice: patrilineal descent and biological kinship in Lamaleran cooperative relationships.
Hum Nat. 2011 Jul;22(1-2):156-76. doi: 10.1007/s12110-011-9113-9. Epub 2011 May 26.
4
Extinction and descent.
Hum Nat. 1994 Jun;5(2):155-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02692159.
7
Emergent matriliny in a matrifocal, patrilineal population: a male coalitionary perspective.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Sep 2;374(1780):20180073. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0073. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
8
9
Phylogenetic reconstruction of Bantu kinship challenges Main Sequence Theory of human social evolution.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17414-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415744111. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
10
Matriarchy, polyandry, and fertility amongst the Mosuos in China.
J Biosoc Sci. 1991 Oct;23(4):499-505. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000019593.

引用本文的文献

1
The formal demography of kinship V: Kin loss, bereavement, and causes of death.
Demogr Res. 2023 Jul-Dec;49. doi: 10.4054/demres.2023.49.41. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Trends in assortative mating in the United States, 1700-1910. Evidence from FamiLinx data.
Hist Fam. 2024 Jun 23;29(4):461-481. doi: 10.1080/1081602X.2024.2352539. eCollection 2024.
4
Kinship and Care: Racial Disparities in Potential Dementia Caregiving in the United States From 2000 to 2060.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Nov 7;79(Supplement_1):S32-S41. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae106.
5
Human cooperation and evolutionary transitions in individuality.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Mar 13;378(1872):20210414. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0414. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Multigenerational Social Mobility: A Demographic Approach.
Sociol Methodol. 2021 Feb;51(1):1-43. doi: 10.1177/0081175020973054. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
7
Genealogical Microdata and Their Significance for Social Science.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2017 Jul;43(1):75-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112157. Epub 2017 May 24.
9
Power and Autistic Traits.
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01290. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
The Intergenerational Effects of Changes in Women's Educational Attainments.
Am Sociol Rev. 2006 Aug;71(4):5542-564. doi: 10.1177/000312240607100402.
2
INTERGENERATIONAL OCCUPATIONAL MOBILITY IN BRITAIN AND THE U.S. SINCE 1850: COMMENT.
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Aug;103(5):2003-2020. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.5.2003.
3
Kinship and the Long-Term Persistence of Inequality in Liaoning, China, 1749-2005.
Chin Sociol Rev. 2011;44(1):71-103. doi: 10.2753/csa2162-0555440105.
4
Low fertility increases descendant socioeconomic position but reduces long-term fitness in a modern post-industrial society.
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 7;279(1746):4342-51. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1415. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
5
Natural and sexual selection in a monogamous historical human population.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 22;109(21):8044-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118174109. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
A multigenerational view of inequality.
Demography. 2011 Feb;48(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0014-7.
8
Evolutionary accounts of human behavioural diversity.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):313-24. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0267.
9
Fertility control in historical China revisited: New Methods for an Old Debate.
Hist Fam. 2010 Oct 29;15(4):370-385. doi: 10.1016/j.hisfam.2010.09.003.
10
Socioeconomic status, education, and reproduction in modern women: an evolutionary perspective.
Am J Hum Biol. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):578-87. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.21048.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验