Suppr超能文献

单药化疗与联合化疗用于既往接受过治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者的比较:一项荟萃分析

Comparison of single agent versus combined chemotherapy in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wu Xiao-Jun, Zhi Yi, He Peng, Zhou Xiao-Zhou, Zheng Ji, Chen Zhi-Wen, Zhou Zhan-Song

机构信息

Institute of Urinary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Mar 15;9:1535-43. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S97062. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (UC) and is generally used in the first-line setting. However, the optimal salvage treatment for previously treated UC patients is unclear. We conducted a systematic review of published clinical trials of single agent versus combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment in previously treated UC patients.

METHODS

Trials published between 1994 and 2015 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library). All relevant studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS), and grade 3/4 toxicities were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive Meta Analysis software (Version 2.0).

RESULTS

Fifty cohorts with 1,685 patients were included for analysis: 814 patients were treated with single agent chemotherapy and 871 with combined chemotherapy. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 year for combined chemotherapy than for single agent (relative risk [RR] 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01-2.37; P=0.03) but not for 2-year OS (RR 1.31; 95% CI: 0.92-1.85; P=0.064). Additionally, combined chemotherapy significantly improved ORR (RR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.60-3.18; P<0.001) and DCR (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.01-1.25, P=0.033) compared to single agent for advanced UC patients. As for grade 3 and 4 toxicities, more frequencies of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were observed in the combined chemotherapy than in single agent group, while equivalent frequencies of anemia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with single agent alone, combined chemotherapy as salvage treatment for advanced UC patients significantly improved ORR, DCR, and 1-year OS, but not 2-year OS. Our findings support the need to compare combined chemotherapy with single agent alone in the salvage setting in large prospective trials due to its potential survival benefit in advanced UC patients.

摘要

背景

铂类化疗是晚期尿路上皮癌(UC)的标准治疗方法,通常用于一线治疗。然而,先前接受治疗的UC患者的最佳挽救治疗方案尚不清楚。我们对已发表的关于单药与联合化疗作为先前接受治疗的UC患者挽救治疗的临床试验进行了系统评价。

方法

通过对公共数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆)进行电子检索,确定1994年至2015年间发表的试验。所有相关研究由两位作者独立确定是否纳入。使用综合Meta分析软件(2.0版)提取并分析人口统计学数据、治疗方案、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期和总生存期的中位数(PFS、OS)以及3/4级毒性。

结果

纳入50个队列共1685例患者进行分析:814例患者接受单药化疗,871例患者接受联合化疗。联合化疗组1年总生存期(OS)显著高于单药化疗组(相对危险度[RR]1.52;95%可信区间:1.01-2.37;P=0.03),但2年总生存期无显著差异(RR 1.31;95%可信区间:0.92-1.85;P=0.064)。此外,对于晚期UC患者,联合化疗与单药化疗相比显著提高了ORR(RR 2.25;95%可信区间:1.60-3.18;P<0.001)和DCR(RR 1.12;95%可信区间:1.01-1.25,P=0.033)。至于3级和4级毒性,联合化疗组白细胞减少和血小板减少的发生率高于单药化疗组,而两组贫血、恶心、呕吐和腹泻的发生率相当。

结论

与单药化疗相比,联合化疗作为晚期UC患者的挽救治疗可显著提高ORR、DCR和1年总生存期,但不能提高2年总生存期。我们的研究结果支持在大型前瞻性试验中,在挽救治疗中比较联合化疗与单药化疗的必要性,因为联合化疗对晚期UC患者可能有生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fe7/4801158/ce1c57250f27/ott-9-1535Fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验