Rai Garjesh Singh, Rai Tina, Jain Leena, Vyas Mahendra Mohan, Roshan Rakesh
Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Center , Bhopal, MP, India .
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research Center , Bhopal, MP, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):TC21-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16852.7249. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
Headache is one of the most common presenting complaints in day to day medical practice however the secondary causes of headache are uncommon. Thus, appropriate selection of headache patient (Pt) is important to determine those that require neuroimaging due to likely secondary cause. Red flags and Clinical warning criterion (CWC) act as a screening tool to help in identifying those who may get benefit from neuroimaging.
To evaluate the findings of computed tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) among patients presented with the chief complaint of headache and to compare the findings between two groups of patients.
This retrospective observational study was carried out in 500 selected patients, who underwent CT or MRI scan of head in Peoples College of Medical Sciences and Research centre, Bhopal, MP during the period of 2 year in between Jan 2013 to Dec 2014. Siemens Somatom sensation 40 slice MDCT and Siemens magnetom 1.5T MRI scanner were used for imaging. Five hundred patients of 10 to 70 year age were selected for the study based on our criterions of selection.
All 500 patients were divided in to two groups A and B based on presence or absence of red flag signs and CWC signs. Group A consists of 48 patients having one or more red flag or CWC signs and group B consists of 452 patients those don't have any above signs. 29 cases (60.4%) out of total 48 cases of group A is suffering from chronic headache as compared to 97 cases (21.5%) out of total 452 patients of group B is having positive findings (p-value<0.05). Out of 500 patients, only 29 cases (5.8%) revealed some form of brain parenchymal pathology whereas other associated findings were seen in 97 cases e.g. sinusitis in 58 (11.6%), bone related pathology in 26 (5.2%) and chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) in 13 (2.6%) patients.
CT/MRI in patients without red flag or CWC sign yields very low percentage of clinically significant positive findings in neuroimaging. In the absence of these, the only reason for CT or MRI scan seems to reassure the patients and their loved ones. CT or MRI as a screening tool in these patients has limited value in term of cost effectiveness.
头痛是日常医疗实践中最常见的就诊主诉之一,然而头痛的继发性病因并不常见。因此,对于头痛患者(Pt)进行恰当选择,以确定那些因可能存在继发性病因而需要进行神经影像学检查的患者,这一点很重要。警示信号和临床警示标准(CWC)作为一种筛查工具,有助于识别那些可能从神经影像学检查中获益的患者。
评估以头痛为主诉就诊的患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)检查结果,并比较两组患者的检查结果。
这项回顾性观察研究在500例选定患者中进行,这些患者于2013年1月至2014年12月期间在印度中央邦博帕尔市人民医学院和研究中心接受了头部CT或MRI扫描。使用西门子Somatom sensation 40层MDCT和西门子1.5T磁共振成像扫描仪进行成像。根据我们的选择标准,选取了500例年龄在10至70岁之间的患者进行研究。
根据是否存在警示信号和CWC体征,将所有500例患者分为A组和B组。A组由48例有一个或多个警示信号或CWC体征的患者组成,B组由452例无上述任何体征的患者组成。A组48例患者中,29例(60.4%)患有慢性头痛,而B组452例患者中,97例(21.5%)有阳性检查结果(p值<0.05)。在500例患者中,只有29例(5.8%)显示出某种形式的脑实质病变,而其他相关检查结果见于97例患者,例如58例(11.6%)患有鼻窦炎,26例(5.2%)有骨相关病变,13例(2.6%)患者患有慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)。
对于没有警示信号或CWC体征的患者,CT/MRI在神经影像学检查中产生具有临床意义的阳性检查结果的比例非常低。在没有这些体征的情况下,进行CT或MRI扫描的唯一原因似乎是让患者及其家属安心。就成本效益而言,CT或MRI作为这些患者的筛查工具价值有限。