Suppr超能文献

足跟痛综合征患者的疼痛阈值测试

Pain Threshold Tests in Patients With Heel Pain Syndrome.

作者信息

Saban Bernice, Masharawi Youssef

机构信息

Spinal Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, the Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel Physical Therapy Service, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Shpeigel 3, Petach Tikva, Petach Tikva, Israel

Spinal Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, the Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

出版信息

Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Jul;37(7):730-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100716642038. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure pain threshold (PPT) is a useful tool for evaluating mechanical sensitivity in patients suffering from various musculoskeletal disorders. However, no previous study has investigated PPT in the heel of patients experiencing plantar heel pain syndrome (PHPS). The aim of this study was to compare PPT levels and topographic presentation of sensitivity in the heel of patients with PHPS and in healthy controls.

METHODS

The reliability of PPT testing in patients with PHPS was assessed for intra- and interrater recordings. The PPT levels of 40 feet in each group were then assessed on 5 predetermined sites in the heel using a standardized measurement protocol. Patient functional status (FS) as measured by the Foot & Ankle Computerized Adaptive Test was employed as an external reference.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis of covariance revealed no group differences for PPTs at all sites (P = .406). Age (P = .099) or BMI (P = .510) did not affect PPT values, although there was an effect on gender (P = .006). The analysis revealed significant differences between sites (P < .001) demonstrating a diverse topographic distribution. In the PHPS group, PPT levels at the anterior/medial, posterior/medial and central sites were significantly lower than at the posterior/lateral and anterior/lateral sites (P < .05). For the control group, PPT levels at the anterior/medial site were significantly lower than all other sites (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found between PPT of the PHPS patients and controls, therefore, PPT cannot be recommended as an assessment tool for these patients. The topographic distribution indicated low PPT levels at the anterior/medial area of the heel in patients with PHPS and controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, comparative study.

摘要

背景

压力疼痛阈值(PPT)是评估各种肌肉骨骼疾病患者机械敏感性的有用工具。然而,以前没有研究调查过足底足跟疼痛综合征(PHPS)患者足跟的PPT。本研究的目的是比较PHPS患者和健康对照者足跟的PPT水平及敏感性的地形分布。

方法

评估PHPS患者PPT测试在评分者内和评分者间记录的可靠性。然后使用标准化测量方案在足跟的5个预定部位评估每组40只脚的PPT水平。采用足踝计算机自适应测试测量的患者功能状态(FS)作为外部参考。

结果

多变量协方差分析显示所有部位的PPT在组间无差异(P = 0.406)。年龄(P = 0.099)或体重指数(BMI)(P = 0.510)对PPT值无影响,尽管性别有影响(P = 0.006)。分析显示部位间存在显著差异(P < 0.001),表明地形分布多样。在PHPS组中,前内侧、后内侧和中央部位的PPT水平显著低于后外侧和前外侧部位(P < 0.05)。对于对照组,前内侧部位的PPT水平显著低于所有其他部位(P < 0.001)。

结论

PHPS患者和对照组的PPT之间未发现显著差异,因此,不建议将PPT作为这些患者的评估工具。地形分布表明PHPS患者和对照组足跟前内侧区域的PPT水平较低。

证据水平

二级,比较研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验