Olsson Pontus, Nysjo Fredrik, Carlbom Ingrid B, Johansson Stefan
IEEE Trans Haptics. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):427-31. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2016.2537803. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Piezoelectric motors offer an attractive alternative to electromagnetic actuators in portable haptic interfaces: they are compact, have a high force-to-volume ratio, and can operate with limited or no gearing. However, the choice of a piezoelectric motor type is not obvious due to differences in performance characteristics. We present our evaluation of two commercial, operationally different, piezoelectric motors acting as actuators in two kinesthetic haptic grippers, a walking quasi-static motor and a traveling wave ultrasonic motor. We evaluate each gripper's ability to display common virtual objects including springs, dampers, and rigid walls, and conclude that the walking quasi-static motor is superior at low velocities. However, for applications where high velocity is required, traveling wave ultrasonic motors are a better option.
在便携式触觉接口中,压电电机为电磁致动器提供了一种有吸引力的替代方案:它们体积紧凑,力体积比高,并且可以在有限或无齿轮传动的情况下运行。然而,由于性能特征的差异,压电电机类型的选择并不明显。我们展示了对两种商用、操作方式不同的压电电机的评估,这两种电机在两个动觉触觉夹具中用作致动器,一种是步进准静态电机,另一种是行波超声电机。我们评估了每个夹具显示常见虚拟物体(包括弹簧、阻尼器和刚性壁)的能力,并得出结论,步进准静态电机在低速时表现更优。然而,对于需要高速的应用,行波超声电机是更好的选择。