Suppr超能文献

行波型与步进型压电电机作为动觉触觉设备中致动器的比较。

Comparison of Walking and Traveling-Wave Piezoelectric Motors as Actuators in Kinesthetic Haptic Devices.

作者信息

Olsson Pontus, Nysjo Fredrik, Carlbom Ingrid B, Johansson Stefan

出版信息

IEEE Trans Haptics. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):427-31. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2016.2537803. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

Abstract

Piezoelectric motors offer an attractive alternative to electromagnetic actuators in portable haptic interfaces: they are compact, have a high force-to-volume ratio, and can operate with limited or no gearing. However, the choice of a piezoelectric motor type is not obvious due to differences in performance characteristics. We present our evaluation of two commercial, operationally different, piezoelectric motors acting as actuators in two kinesthetic haptic grippers, a walking quasi-static motor and a traveling wave ultrasonic motor. We evaluate each gripper's ability to display common virtual objects including springs, dampers, and rigid walls, and conclude that the walking quasi-static motor is superior at low velocities. However, for applications where high velocity is required, traveling wave ultrasonic motors are a better option.

摘要

在便携式触觉接口中,压电电机为电磁致动器提供了一种有吸引力的替代方案:它们体积紧凑,力体积比高,并且可以在有限或无齿轮传动的情况下运行。然而,由于性能特征的差异,压电电机类型的选择并不明显。我们展示了对两种商用、操作方式不同的压电电机的评估,这两种电机在两个动觉触觉夹具中用作致动器,一种是步进准静态电机,另一种是行波超声电机。我们评估了每个夹具显示常见虚拟物体(包括弹簧、阻尼器和刚性壁)的能力,并得出结论,步进准静态电机在低速时表现更优。然而,对于需要高速的应用,行波超声电机是更好的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验