Gambhir Ramandeep Singh, Singh Gurminder, Talwar Puneet Singh, Gambhir Jaskaran, Munjal Vaibhav
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Gian Sagar Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
Department of Prosthodontics, Gian Sagar Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India.
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016 Jan-Apr;8(1):2-6. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.176954.
Forensic dentistry involves the processing, review, evaluation, and presentation of dental evidence with the purpose of contributing scientific and objective data to legal processes. The present, systematic review was conducted to assess knowledge and awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in India. A systematic review of relevant cross-sectional studies was conducted regarding the level of knowledge, awareness, and practical application of forensic odontology among dentists in India. Four out of 129 studies were finally included in the present review after conducting a search of both electronic and manual scientific databases. Potential biases were addressed and the relevant data were extracted by the concerned investigators. Almost all the subjects were familiar with the subject of forensic odontology in one of the study reports. Only 12% of dentists were maintaining complete dental records in the findings of another study. Only 4% of dentists reported to have contributed to the identification of victims in a mass disaster in yet another study. The findings of another study revealed that 40% of dental practitioners did not have the expertise to identify child abuse. The results of the present review showed that the knowledge and awareness level of subjects was inadequate and that there is considerable variation in the practice of forensic odontology among dentists. It is necessary to expose dentists to the basic principles and techniques of the subject.
法医牙科学涉及牙科证据的处理、审查、评估和呈现,目的是为法律程序提供科学和客观的数据。本次系统评价旨在评估印度牙医对法医牙科学的知识和认识。对有关印度牙医法医牙科学知识水平、认识和实际应用的相关横断面研究进行了系统评价。在对电子和手工科学数据库进行检索后,最终有129项研究中的4项被纳入本评价。相关研究人员处理了潜在的偏倚并提取了相关数据。在其中一份研究报告中,几乎所有受试者都熟悉法医牙科学主题。在另一项研究的结果中,只有12%的牙医保存完整的牙科记录。在另一项研究中,只有4%的牙医报告曾在重大灾难中协助识别受害者。另一项研究的结果显示,40%的牙科从业者没有识别虐待儿童的专业知识。本评价结果表明,受试者的知识和认识水平不足,牙医在法医牙科学实践方面存在相当大的差异。有必要让牙医了解该学科的基本原则和技术。