Khare Parul, Chandra Shaleen, Raj Vineet, Verma Poonam, Subha G, Khare Abhishek
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Maharana Pratap College of Dentistry, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013 Jul;5(2):134-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-1475.119783.
Dentist can play a significant role in identifying the victims or perpetrators of crime as well as in disasters. Knowledge about the various aspects of forensic science as well as dental and related evidences can help a dental practitioner in assisting the civil agencies in such cases.
To evaluate the awareness and knowledge of forensic odontology among dentists in a metropolitan and a tier 2 city.
Seven hundred and seventy four dentists were included in this survey. Questionnaire was designed to assess the knowledge, aptitude, and status of practice of forensic odontology. Data was analyzed by comparing overall awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in metro and tier 2 city as well as between the different groups.
Apart from the source of knowledge, no significant differences were seen in respondents of metropolitan and tier 2 city. Significantly higher proportion of subjects in metro reported journals as source of knowledge (P < 0.001), whereas it was newspaper in tier 2 city (P = 0.001). On comparing the mean scores of knowledge (k), aptitude (a), and practice (p) among different study groups, it was found that all the three scores were highest for practitioner cum academician (PA) group (k - 2.37, a - 0.69, P - 0.17). Knowledge scores were minimum for pure practitioner (PP) group (1.98), and attitude and practice scores of pure academician (A) group were minimum (a - 0.53, P - 0.06).
Respondents had low knowledge about the applications of forensic odontology in routine practice; hence, steps must be taken to educate the dental practitioners about its clinical applications.
牙医在识别犯罪受害者或犯罪者以及灾难受害者方面可以发挥重要作用。了解法医学的各个方面以及牙科和相关证据,有助于牙科从业者在此类案件中协助民事机构。
评估大城市和二线城市牙医对法医牙科学的认识和知识。
本调查纳入了774名牙医。设计问卷以评估法医牙科学的知识、能力和实践状况。通过比较大城市和二线城市牙医对法医牙科学的总体认识以及不同组之间的情况来分析数据。
除了知识来源外,大城市和二线城市的受访者没有显著差异。大城市中,显著更高比例的受试者报告期刊为知识来源(P < 0.001),而在二线城市是报纸(P = 0.001)。比较不同研究组的知识(k)、能力(a)和实践(p)平均得分,发现从业者兼学者(PA)组的所有三项得分最高(k - 2.37,a - 0.69,P - 0.17)。纯从业者(PP)组的知识得分最低(1.98),纯学者(A)组的态度和实践得分最低(a - 0.53,P - 0.06)。
受访者对法医牙科学在日常实践中的应用了解不足;因此,必须采取措施对牙科从业者进行其临床应用方面的教育。