Qureshi Ihtesham A, Maud Alberto, Cruz-Flores Salvador, Rodriguez Gustavo J
Neurology Department, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, Tex., USA.
Interv Neurol. 2016 Mar;4(3-4):83-9. doi: 10.1159/000442578. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
In this article, we present our experience with the recanalization of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), we hypothesize that there are higher rates of recanalization with fewer stent retriever passes and better clinical outcomes in patients with division MCA occlusions. A more complex anatomy at the bifurcation may prevent a faster recanalization in main trunk MCA occlusions.
We retrospectively identified consecutive patients admitted with MCA occlusions who underwent mechanical thrombectomy using stent retrievers. We categorized patients into division MCA and main trunk MCA occlusions based on angiography. Variables were compared between the groups. We further analyzed patients with trunk MCA occlusions to identify reasons for delays in recanalization.
There were 32 MCA occlusions that underwent mechanical thrombectomy and eligible for the analysis during the study period. Of those, 11 were main trunk MCA occlusions. Univariate analysis disclosed a trend toward a lower GP-to-recanalization time (p = 0.05) and a lower number of passes required for recanalization in division MCA occlusions. However, there was a significantly better outcome in patients with division MCA occlusion after multivariate analysis. Analyzing main trunk MCA occlusion data, we found that the need for more than one pass to achieve recanalization led to a trend toward a longer GP-to-recanalization time and a worse outcome. When the stent was placed in the dominant division, the chances of recanalization were significantly higher.
Division MCA occlusions have higher recanalization rates with fewer stent retriever passes and better clinical outcomes than main trunk MCA occlusions, likely due to a more favorable anatomy. Measures like placing the stent retriever in the dominant division may decrease recanalization times and improve clinical outcomes in main trunk MCA occlusions.
在本文中,我们介绍了我们在大脑中动脉(MCA)再通方面的经验,我们假设在MCA分支闭塞患者中,支架取栓次数越少,再通率越高,临床结局越好。分叉处更复杂的解剖结构可能会阻碍主干MCA闭塞的更快再通。
我们回顾性确定了连续收治的因MCA闭塞接受支架取栓的患者。根据血管造影将患者分为MCA分支闭塞和主干MCA闭塞。对两组之间的变量进行比较。我们进一步分析主干MCA闭塞患者以确定再通延迟的原因。
在研究期间,有32例MCA闭塞患者接受了机械取栓并符合分析条件。其中,11例为主干MCA闭塞。单因素分析显示MCA分支闭塞患者从股动脉穿刺到再通的时间有缩短趋势(p = 0.05),再通所需的穿刺次数也较少。然而,多因素分析显示MCA分支闭塞患者的结局明显更好。分析主干MCA闭塞数据时,我们发现需要多次穿刺才能实现再通会导致从股动脉穿刺到再通的时间有延长趋势,且结局更差。当支架置于优势分支时,再通的机会明显更高。
与主干MCA闭塞相比,MCA分支闭塞的再通率更高,支架取栓次数更少,临床结局更好,这可能是由于其解剖结构更有利。在主干MCA闭塞中,将支架取栓器置于优势分支等措施可能会缩短再通时间并改善临床结局。