Thiessen Amber, Beukelman David, Hux Karen, Longenecker Maria
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Apr 1;59(2):290-301. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0115.
The purpose of the study was to compare the visual attention patterns of adults with aphasia and adults without neurological conditions when viewing visual scenes with 2 types of engagement.
Eye-tracking technology was used to measure the visual attention patterns of 10 adults with aphasia and 10 adults without neurological conditions. Participants viewed camera-engaged (i.e., human figure facing camera) and task-engaged (i.e., human figure looking at and touching an object) visual scenes.
Participants with aphasia responded to engagement cues by focusing on objects of interest more for task-engaged scenes than camera-engaged scenes; however, the difference in their responses to these scenes were not as pronounced as those observed in adults without neurological conditions. In addition, people with aphasia spent more time looking at background areas of interest and less time looking at person areas of interest for camera-engaged scenes than did control participants.
Results indicate people with aphasia visually attend to scenes differently than adults without neurological conditions. As a consequence, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) facilitators may have different visual attention behaviors than the people with aphasia for whom they are constructing or selecting visual scenes. Further examination of the visual attention of people with aphasia may help optimize visual scene selection.
本研究的目的是比较患有失语症的成年人与无神经疾病的成年人在观看具有两种参与类型的视觉场景时的视觉注意力模式。
使用眼动追踪技术测量10名患有失语症的成年人和10名无神经疾病的成年人的视觉注意力模式。参与者观看了镜头参与型(即人物面向镜头)和任务参与型(即人物看着并触摸一个物体)的视觉场景。
患有失语症的参与者对参与线索的反应是,在任务参与型场景中比在镜头参与型场景中更关注感兴趣的物体;然而,他们对这些场景反应的差异不如在无神经疾病的成年人中观察到的那么明显。此外,与对照组参与者相比,患有失语症的人在观看镜头参与型场景时,花更多时间看感兴趣的背景区域,花更少时间看感兴趣的人物区域。
结果表明,患有失语症的人与无神经疾病的成年人在视觉上关注场景的方式不同。因此,辅助和替代沟通(AAC)促进者在构建或选择视觉场景时,可能与他们所服务的患有失语症的人有不同的视觉注意力行为。进一步研究患有失语症的人的视觉注意力可能有助于优化视觉场景的选择。