Randa Ryan, Reyns Bradford W, Nobles Matt R
1 Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA.
2 Weber State University, Ogden, UT, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jan;34(2):392-415. doi: 10.1177/0886260516641279. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
Extant research on school bullying has largely focused on the incidence rather than the modality of the experience, leaving key questions about impact unexplored. With a nationally representative sample of more than 3,000 cases, the present study explores the utility of expanding the classification scheme of bullying victimization to include limited victimization and persistent victimization experiences. By examining the differences in victimization, fear of victimization, and avoidance behaviors, the present study establishes that significant differences in fear of future victimization and adaptive avoidance behaviors do exist between the groups classified as limited and persistent. Furthermore, the present study explores the potential differences in the moderating influence of fear of future victimization on the relationship between limited/persistent bullying victimization and adaptive avoidance behavior. Ultimately, the evidence suggests that differentiating between limited and persistent bullying victimization is important for understanding the impact of bullying on students.
现有的关于校园欺凌的研究主要集中在发生率上,而非欺凌体验的形式,从而使得有关欺凌影响的关键问题未得到探讨。本研究以一个具有全国代表性的3000多个案例的样本,探讨了扩大欺凌受害分类方案以纳入有限受害和持续受害经历的效用。通过考察受害、对受害的恐惧以及回避行为的差异,本研究证实,在被归类为有限受害和持续受害的群体之间,对未来受害的恐惧和适应性回避行为确实存在显著差异。此外,本研究还探讨了对未来受害的恐惧在有限/持续欺凌受害与适应性回避行为之间的关系中所起的调节作用的潜在差异。最终,证据表明,区分有限欺凌受害和持续欺凌受害对于理解欺凌对学生的影响至关重要。