Department of Psychology, Coast University Center, University of Guadalajara, Puerto Vallarta 48280, Mexico.
Department of Education and Social Psychology, Pablo de Olavide University, 41013 Seville, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 4;17(13):4831. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134831.
This transversal study over a random representative sample of 1687 Mexican students attending public and private secondary schools (54% girls, 12-17 years old, = 13.65. = 1.14) aimed to analyze psychosocial differences between victims and non-victims of bullying from the bioecological model. It included individual variables (ontosystem), familiar, community, and scholar factors (microsystem), and gender (macrosystem) to perform a multivariate discriminant analysis and a logistic regression analysis. The discriminant analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with mother and father, and a positive attitude toward social norms transgression characterized the high victimization cluster. For the non-victims, the discriminant variables were community implication, positive attitude toward institutional authority, and open communication with the mother. These variables allowed for correctly predicting membership in 76% of the cases. Logistic regression analysis found that psychological distress, offensive communication with the father, and being a boy increased the probability of high victimization, while a positive attitude toward authority, open communication with the mother, and being a girl decrease this probability. These results highlight the importance of open and offensive communication between adolescents and their parents on psychological distress, attitude toward authority, community implication, and bullying victimization.
本横断面研究以随机抽取的 1687 名墨西哥公立和私立中学学生为研究对象(女生占 54%,年龄为 12-17 岁, = 13.65, = 1.14),旨在从生物生态模型的角度分析欺凌行为受害者和非受害者的心理社会差异。研究纳入了个体变量(个体系统)、家庭、社区和学校因素(微观系统)以及性别(宏观系统),并进行了多元判别分析和逻辑回归分析。判别分析发现,心理困扰、与父母的攻击性交流以及对社会规范违规的积极态度是高受害群体的特征。对于非受害者,判别变量是社区参与、对制度权威的积极态度和与母亲的开放沟通。这些变量能够正确预测 76%的案例归属。逻辑回归分析发现,心理困扰、与父亲的攻击性交流以及男性身份增加了高受害的可能性,而对权威的积极态度、与母亲的开放沟通以及女性身份则降低了这种可能性。这些结果强调了青少年与父母之间开放和攻击性沟通对心理困扰、对权威的态度、社区参与和欺凌受害的重要性。