Suppr超能文献

伊伐布雷定治疗稳定型心绞痛的有效性。

Effectiveness of Ivabradine in Treating Stable Angina Pectoris.

作者信息

Ye Liwen, Ke Dazhi, Chen Qingwei, Li Guiqiong, Deng Wei, Wu Zhiqin

机构信息

From the Department of Geriatrics Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(14):e3245. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003245.

Abstract

Many studies show that ivabradine is effective for stable angina.This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of treatment duration and control group type on ivabradine efficacy in stable angina pectoris.Relevant articles in the English language in the PUBMED and EMBASE databases and related websites were identified by using the search terms "ivabradine," "angina," "randomized controlled trials," and "Iva." The final search date was November 2, 2015.Articles were included if they were published randomized controlled trials that related to ivabradine treatment of stable angina pectoris.Patients with stable angina pectoris were included.The patients were classified according to treatment duration (<3 vs ≥3 months) or type of control group (placebo vs beta-receptor blocker). Angina outcomes were heart rate at rest or peak, exercise duration, and time to angina onset.Seven articles were selected. There were 3747 patients: 2100 and 1647 were in the ivabradine and control groups, respectively. The ivabradine group had significantly longer exercise duration when they had been treated for at least 3 months, but not when treatment time was less than 3 months. Ivabradine significantly improved time to angina onset regardless of treatment duration. Control group type did not influence the effect of exercise duration (significant) or time to angina onset (significant).Compared with beta-blocker and placebo, ivabradine improved exercise duration and time to onset of angina in patients with stable angina. However, its ability to improve exercise duration only became significant after at least 3 months of treatment.

摘要

许多研究表明,伊伐布雷定对稳定型心绞痛有效。进行这项荟萃分析是为了确定治疗持续时间和对照组类型对伊伐布雷定治疗稳定型心绞痛疗效的影响。通过使用搜索词“伊伐布雷定”“心绞痛”“随机对照试验”和“Iva”,在PUBMED和EMBASE数据库以及相关网站中识别英文相关文章。最终搜索日期为2015年11月2日。如果文章是已发表的与伊伐布雷定治疗稳定型心绞痛相关的随机对照试验,则纳入研究。纳入稳定型心绞痛患者。根据治疗持续时间(<3个月与≥3个月)或对照组类型(安慰剂与β受体阻滞剂)对患者进行分类。心绞痛结局指标为静息或峰值心率、运动持续时间和心绞痛发作时间。共筛选出7篇文章。有3747例患者:伊伐布雷定组和对照组分别有2100例和1647例。伊伐布雷定组接受至少3个月治疗时运动持续时间显著延长,但治疗时间少于3个月时则不然。无论治疗持续时间如何,伊伐布雷定均能显著改善心绞痛发作时间。对照组类型不影响运动持续时间(显著)或心绞痛发作时间(显著)的疗效。与β受体阻滞剂和安慰剂相比,伊伐布雷定可改善稳定型心绞痛患者的运动持续时间和心绞痛发作时间。然而,其改善运动持续时间的能力仅在至少3个月治疗后才变得显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9e7e/4998780/168dba8cf80e/medi-95-e3245-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验