Suppr超能文献

基因检测和患者报告结局对辅助化疗接受情况的影响。

Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

作者信息

Evans Chalanda N, Brewer Noel T, Vadaparampil Susan T, Boisvert Marc, Ottaviano Yvonne, Lee M Catherine, Isaacs Claudine, Schwartz Marc D, O'Neill Suzanne C

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Fisher Center for Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, 3300 Whitehaven Street, NW, Suite 4100, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.

Gillings School of Global Public Health, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(3):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3780-5. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Abstract

Practice guidelines incorporate genomic tumor profiling, using results such as the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), to refine recurrence risk estimates for the large proportion of breast cancer patients with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive disease. We sought to understand the impact of receiving genomic recurrence risk estimates on breast cancer patients' well-being and the impact of these patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants were 193 women (mean age 57) newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Women were interviewed before and 2-3 weeks after receiving the RS result between 2011 and 2015. We assessed subsequent receipt of chemotherapy from chart review. After receiving their RS, perceived pros (t = 4.27, P < .001) and cons (t = 8.54, P < .001) of chemotherapy increased from pre-test to post-test, while perceived risk of breast cancer recurrence decreased (t = 2.90, P = .004). Women with high RS tumors were more likely to receive chemotherapy than women with low RS tumors (88 vs. 5 %, OR 0.01, 0.00-0.02, P < .001). Higher distress (OR 2.19, 95 % CI 1.05-4.57, P < .05) and lower perceived cons of chemotherapy (OR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.26-0.97, P < .05) also predicted receipt of chemotherapy. Distressed patients who saw few downsides of chemotherapy received this treatment. Clinicians should consider these factors when discussing chemotherapy with breast cancer patients.

摘要

实践指南纳入了基因组肿瘤分析,利用诸如Oncotype DX复发评分(RS)等结果,来优化对大部分早期雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的复发风险评估。我们试图了解获得基因组复发风险评估对乳腺癌患者幸福感的影响,以及这些患者报告的结果对辅助化疗接受情况的影响。研究参与者为193名新诊断为早期乳腺癌的女性(平均年龄57岁)。在2011年至2015年期间,这些女性在收到RS结果之前以及之后2至3周接受了访谈。我们通过病历审查评估后续化疗的接受情况。在收到RS结果后,化疗的感知益处(t = 4.27,P <.001)和弊端(t = 8.54,P <.001)从测试前到测试后均有所增加,而乳腺癌复发的感知风险则降低(t = 2.90,P =.004)。RS高的肿瘤患者比RS低的肿瘤患者更有可能接受化疗(88%对5%,OR 0.01,0.00 - 0.02,P <.001)。更高的痛苦程度(OR 2.19,95%CI 1.05 - 4.57,P <.05)和更低的化疗感知弊端(OR 0.50,95%CI 0.26 - 0.97,P <.05)也预示着会接受化疗。认为化疗弊端少的痛苦患者接受了这种治疗。临床医生在与乳腺癌患者讨论化疗时应考虑这些因素。

相似文献

1
Impact of genomic testing and patient-reported outcomes on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Apr;156(3):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3780-5. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4587-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
5
21-Gene recurrence score decreases receipt of chemotherapy in ER+ early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCDB 2010-2013.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep;159(2):315-26. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3926-5. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
6
Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use and Health Care Costs After Introduction of Genomic Testing in Breast Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 20;33(36):4259-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.9023. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
8
The impact of Oncotype DX breast cancer assay results on clinical practice: a UK experience.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(3):809-817. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05578-6. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
9
Oncotype DX testing in node-positive breast cancer strongly impacts chemotherapy use at a comprehensive cancer center.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan;185(1):215-227. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05931-9. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

3
Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(10):1-234. eCollection 2020.
4
Benefits of introduction of Oncotype DX testing.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):55-59. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0173. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
Multilevel Influences on Patient-Oncologist Communication about Genomic Test Results: Oncologist Perspectives.
J Health Commun. 2018;23(7):679-686. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1506836. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1065-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.8503. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
2
Influence of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Chemotherapy Delivery in Breast Cancer.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Feb;16(1):59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Adoption of Gene Expression Profiling for Breast Cancer in US Oncology Practice for Women Younger Than 65 Years.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Oct;13(10):1216-24. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0150.
4
Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510764. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
7
Oncotype Dx assay and breast cancer in the United States: usage and concordance with chemotherapy.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 May;151(1):149-56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3366-7. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
8
The value of personalizing medicine: medical oncologists' views on gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment.
Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):351-6. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0268. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
9
Patients' preferences for surgical and adjuvant systemic treatment in early breast cancer: a systematic review.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Sep;40(8):1005-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
10
Patients' perceptions of gene expression profiling in breast cancer treatment decisions.
Curr Oncol. 2014 Apr;21(2):e203-11. doi: 10.3747/co.21.1524.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验