Huber-Huber Christoph, Ditye Thomas, Marchante Fernández María, Ansorge Ulrich
Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, University of Vienna, Austria.
Department of Basic Psychological Research and Research Methods, University of Vienna, Austria.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.035. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
According to the pre-motor theory of attention, attention is shifted to a saccade's landing position before the saccade is executed. Such pre-saccadic attention shifts are usually studied in psychophysical dual-task conditions, with a target-discrimination task before saccade onset. Here, we present a novel approach to investigate pre-saccadic attention shifts with the help of event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants executed one or two saccades to color-defined targets while ERPs and eye-movements were recorded. In single-target blocks participants executed a single saccade. In two-targets blocks participants made either a single saccade to one of the targets, or two successive saccades to both targets. Importantly, in two-targets blocks, targets could appear on the same or on opposite sides of the vertical midline. This allowed us to study contra-to-ipsilateral ERP differences (such as the N2pc or PCN) that reflect attention shifts to the targets, prior to saccade onset and during saccades. If pre-saccadic attention shifts to saccade target locations are necessary for saccade execution and if searched-for saccade targets capture attention, there should be enhanced attentional competition (1) between two targets compared to single targets; (2) between two opposite-sides targets compared to two same-side targets; and (3) in two saccades rather than one saccade conditions: More attentional competition was expected to delay saccade latency and to weaken pre-saccadic laterality effects in ERPs. Hypotheses were tested by means of temporally aligned ERPs that were simultaneously time-locked to stimulus onsets, saccade onsets, and saccade offsets. Predictions (1) and (2) were partly and fully confirmed, respectively, but no evidence was found for (3). We explain the implications of our results for the role of attention during saccade preparation, and we point out how temporally aligned ERPs compare to ICA-based electroencephalogram (EEG) artifact correction procedures and to psychophysical dual-task approaches.
根据注意力的运动前理论,在扫视执行之前,注意力会转移到扫视的着陆位置。这种扫视前的注意力转移通常在心理物理学双任务条件下进行研究,即在扫视开始前进行目标辨别任务。在此,我们提出一种借助事件相关电位(ERP)来研究扫视前注意力转移的新方法。参与者在记录ERP和眼动的同时,对颜色定义的目标执行一次或两次扫视。在单目标块中,参与者执行一次扫视。在双目标块中,参与者要么对其中一个目标执行一次扫视,要么对两个目标连续执行两次扫视。重要的是,在双目标块中,目标可以出现在垂直中线的同一侧或相对侧。这使我们能够研究对侧到同侧的ERP差异(如N2pc或PCN),这些差异反映了在扫视开始前和扫视过程中注意力向目标的转移。如果扫视执行需要扫视前注意力转移到扫视目标位置,并且如果搜索的扫视目标吸引注意力,那么在以下情况中应该会增强注意力竞争:(1)与单目标相比,两个目标之间;(2)与两个同侧目标相比,两个相对侧目标之间;(3)在两次扫视而非一次扫视的条件下:预计更多的注意力竞争会延迟扫视潜伏期并减弱ERP中的扫视前偏侧效应。通过与刺激开始、扫视开始和扫视结束同时锁时的时间对齐ERP来检验假设。预测(1)和(2)分别得到了部分和完全证实,但未找到(3)的证据。我们解释了我们的结果对扫视准备过程中注意力作用的影响,并指出时间对齐的ERP与基于独立成分分析(ICA)的脑电图(EEG)伪迹校正程序以及心理物理学双任务方法相比如何。