Yarnold P R, Mueser K T
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611.
Br J Med Psychol. 1989 Mar;62(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1989.tb02809.x.
The accuracy of assessments of Type A behaviour made using different methods is the focus of active debate. Presented here are preliminary meta-analyses regarding: (a) internal consistency, test-retest and parallel forms reliabilities of the most frequently used questionnaire (Jenkins Activity Survey); (b) inter-rater and test-retest reliabilities of the most prospectively valid method (Friedman Structured Interview); and (c) correlations and percentage classification agreement between these measures. The findings generally suggest highly statistically significant yet moderate effect strengths for these various psychometric properties.
使用不同方法对A型行为进行评估的准确性是当前激烈争论的焦点。本文呈现了关于以下方面的初步荟萃分析:(a)最常用问卷(詹金斯活动调查表)的内部一致性、重测信度和平行效度;(b)最具前瞻性效度的方法(弗里德曼结构化访谈)的评分者间信度和重测信度;以及(c)这些测量方法之间的相关性和百分比分类一致性。研究结果总体表明,这些不同心理测量属性在统计学上具有高度显著性,但效应强度适中。