• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同酸蚀模式对非龋性硬化牙本质粘结强度的影响]

[Influence of different acid etching modes on bond strengths to non-carious sclerotic dentin].

作者信息

Liu Ke-le, Zhang Xiao-fang, Wei Xin

机构信息

VIP Department, School of Stomatology, China Medical University. Shengyang 110002, Liaoning Province, China. E-mail:

VIP Department, School of Stomatology, China Medical University. Shengyang 110002, Liaoning Province, China.

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Feb;25(1):38-41.

PMID:27063306
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of different acid etching modes on bond strength between composite resin and non-carious sclerotic dentin, and to provide references for clinical application.

MOTHODS

Thirty premolars with naturally-occurring non-carious cervical lesions were divided into 2 groups based on self-etch adhesive system AdperTM Easy one (AEO) and total-etch adhesive system AdperTM Single Bond2 (ASB2). Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups (ASB21, ASB22, ASB23, AEO1, AEO2, AEO3) and subjected to the following processing: ASB21 subgroup was etched for 15 s with 35% phosphoric acid and coated with binder for 15 s; ASB22 subgroup was etched for 30 s with 35% phosphoric acid and coated with binder for 15 s; ASB23 subgroup was etched for 15 s with 35% phosphoric acid and coated with binder for 30 s; AEO1 subgroup was only etched with binder for 20 s; AEO2 subgroup was etched with binder for 40 s; AEO3 subgroup was etched for 15 s with 35% phosphoric acid and coated with binder for 20 s. The samples were restored with composite resin; 24 h after saved in distilled water at room temperature, the teeth were cut into dumbbell-shaped specimens with surface areas of approximately 1.0 mm2. The microtensile bond strength (μTBS) was detected and evaluated by one-way ANOVA and SNK-q test using SPSS 17.0 software package.

RESULTS

μTBS was given in MPa: AEO3>ASB22>ASB23>ASB21>AEO2>AEO1, AEO3 resulted in statistically highest bond strength and AEO1 had the lowest bond strength (P<0.05), ASB22 acquired bond strength just lower than AEO3 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of total-etch adhesive system increasing the etching time of phosphoric time can enhance bond strength. For self-etch adhesive system,both duplicated the time of adhesive treatment and use of phosphoric acid can improve the bond strength. Use of phosphoric acid to etch for 15 s and coated with self-etch adhesive system for 20 s achieved the highest bond strength. In either self-etch or total-etch adhesive system, use of phosphoric acid to etch for 15 s and coated with self-etch adhesive system for 20 s achieved optimal bond strength, there was the lowest bond strength when the self-etch adhesive system used as recommended time.

摘要

目的

评估不同酸蚀方式对复合树脂与非龋性硬化牙本质间粘结强度的影响,为临床应用提供参考。

方法

选取30颗有自然发生的非龋性颈部病变的前磨牙,根据自酸蚀粘结系统AdperTM Easy one(AEO)和全酸蚀粘结系统AdperTM Single Bond2(ASB2)分为2组。每组再进一步分为3个亚组(ASB21、ASB22、ASB23、AEO1、AEO2、AEO3)并进行如下处理:ASB21亚组用35%磷酸酸蚀15 s,涂粘结剂15 s;ASB22亚组用35%磷酸酸蚀30 s,涂粘结剂15 s;ASB23亚组用35%磷酸酸蚀15 s,涂粘结剂30 s;AEO1亚组仅用粘结剂蚀刻20 s;AEO2亚组用粘结剂蚀刻40 s;AEO3亚组用35%磷酸酸蚀15 s,涂粘结剂20 s。样本用复合树脂修复;在室温下于蒸馏水中保存24 h后,将牙齿切成表面积约为1.0 mm2的哑铃形标本。使用SPSS 17.0软件包通过单因素方差分析和SNK-q检验检测并评估微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)。

结果

μTBS以MPa表示:AEO3>ASB22>ASB23>ASB21>AEO2>AEO1,AEO3的粘结强度在统计学上最高,AEO1的粘结强度最低(P<0.05),ASB22获得的粘结强度仅低于AEO3(P<0.05)。

结论

使用全酸蚀粘结系统增加磷酸酸蚀时间可提高粘结强度。对于自酸蚀粘结系统,增加粘结处理时间和使用磷酸均可提高粘结强度。用磷酸酸蚀15 s并涂自酸蚀粘结系统20 s可获得最高粘结强度。在自酸蚀或全酸蚀粘结系统中,用磷酸酸蚀15 s并涂自酸蚀粘结系统20 s可获得最佳粘结强度,按推荐时间使用自酸蚀粘结系统时粘结强度最低。

相似文献

1
[Influence of different acid etching modes on bond strengths to non-carious sclerotic dentin].[不同酸蚀模式对非龋性硬化牙本质粘结强度的影响]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Feb;25(1):38-41.
2
Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives.磷酸酸蚀处理对两种自酸蚀黏结剂剪切黏结强度的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;21(1):56-62. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757201302370.
3
"No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study.“无瓶”与“多瓶”牙本质黏结剂——微拉伸黏结强度及形态学研究
Dent Mater. 2001 Sep;17(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00084-1.
4
Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique.使用自酸蚀和全酸蚀技术测定与硬化牙本质的微拉伸粘结强度。
Dent Mater. 2002 Jul;18(5):359-69. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00051-3.
5
Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching.自酸蚀粘结剂与经额外磷酸酸蚀的牙釉质之间的剪切粘结强度。
Oper Dent. 2008 Mar-Apr;33(2):155-62. doi: 10.2341/07-63.
6
Sodium hypochlorite as dentin pretreatment for etch-and-rinse single-bottle and two-step self-etching adhesives: atomic force microscope and tensile bond strength evaluation.次氯酸钠作为酸蚀冲洗单瓶装和两步自酸蚀粘结剂的牙本质预处理:原子力显微镜和拉伸粘结强度评估
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Feb;10(2):135-44.
7
Effects of phosphoric acid pretreatment and substitution of bonding resin on bonding effectiveness of self-etching systems to enamel.磷酸预处理及粘结树脂替代对自酸蚀系统与牙釉质粘结效果的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2007 Dec;9(6):537-45.
8
The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.即刻牙本质封闭对全酸蚀和自酸蚀粘结剂边缘适应性及粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jul;102(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00073-0.
9
Microtensile bond strengths and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of self-adhesive and self-etch resin cements to intact and etched enamel.自粘型和自酸蚀型树脂水门汀与完整及酸蚀釉质的微拉伸粘结强度及扫描电子显微镜评价
J Prosthet Dent. 2008 Sep;100(3):203-10. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60179-1.
10
Bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: effect of acid etching time.与颈部硬化牙本质的粘结:酸蚀时间的影响
J Adhes Dent. 2004 Spring;6(1):19-23.