Dienhart Carolyn, Maruyama Geoffrey, Snyder Mark, Furco Andrew, McKay Monica Siems, Hirt Laurel, Huesman Ronald
a University of Minnesota.
J Soc Psychol. 2016;156(3):305-9. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2015.1111856.
This naturalistic study examined differences in students' motivations for elective versus required service-learning (SL) classes. Students in two successive academic years' cohorts were surveyed by the SL center at a large Midwestern university. Analyses compared classes differing in requirements for community-based service. Students required to participate in community service as part of a class within a program required for admission to a university were less likely to: want to be involved in future community work; enroll in another SL class; and recommend their class, compared to other groups of students, including others from classes in which SL was required as part of the program in which students were enrolled. These findings suggest that students' motivations to participate in community-engaged activities are not shaped simply by whether or not community engagement is required in SL classes, but also by other factors including how the engagement opportunity is contextualized.
这项自然主义研究考察了学生参加选修与必修服务学习(SL)课程的动机差异。一所位于中西部的大型大学的服务学习中心对连续两个学年的学生群体进行了调查。分析比较了基于社区服务要求不同的课程。与其他学生群体相比,那些作为大学入学所需课程的一部分而被要求参加社区服务的学生更不太可能:希望参与未来的社区工作;报名参加另一门服务学习课程;以及推荐他们的课程,其他学生群体包括那些在所注册课程中服务学习是必修部分的学生。这些发现表明,学生参与社区参与活动的动机不仅仅取决于服务学习课程中是否要求社区参与,还受到其他因素的影响,包括参与机会是如何被情境化的。