• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[标准听力图类型所代表的听力损失对未助听APHAB评分的影响]

[The Influence of Hearing Loss Represented by Standard Audiogram Types to Unaided APHAB Scores].

作者信息

Löhler J, Akcicek B, Kappe T, Wollenberg B, Schlattmann P, Schönweiler R

机构信息

Deutscher Berufsverband der HNO-Ärzte e. V., Wissenschaftliches Institut für angewandte HNO-Heilkunde (WIAHNO), Bad Bramstedt.

HNO-Praxis, Dortmund.

出版信息

Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 Aug;95(8):540-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111569. Epub 2016 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0041-111569
PMID:27064271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Questionnaires as the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) are besides pure-tone and speech-audiometry the third method of diagnostics in audiology. Up to now there has been no research on the influence of individual hearing loss, represented by standard audiograms, on the scores of the unaided APHAB (APHABu) done with a big number of subjects. This study will investigate whether there does exist such a relationship or not.

METHODS

A total of 2 745 records provided by a database were analysed. First, the subjects' audiograms (air conduction) were allocated to 7 standardised audiogram types. By using a multivariant mixed linear model a potential connection was examined between these standard audiograms and particular APHABu scores for its four subscales: EC - ease of communication, BN - background noise, RV - reverberation, AV - aversiveness of sounds.

RESULTS

There was no evidence for a dependency between any type of hearing loss dependence and unaided APHAB-scores. The values on the EC-scale vary between 49.8 and 58.0, on the BN-scale between 45.3 and 46.6, on the RV-scale between 44.4 and 52.4, and on the AV-scale between 47.6 and 50.1.

DISCUSSION

This result confirms earlier studies with other questionnaires. Therefore, the APHABu can be used as an initial instrument for the diagnostics of individual hearing loss independently on whether hearing aids will be fitted subsequently or not.

摘要

背景

问卷,如失语症听力辅助效益简表(APHAB),是听力学诊断中除纯音和言语测听法之外的第三种方法。到目前为止,尚未有关于以标准听力图表示的个体听力损失对大量受试者未佩戴助听器时的APHAB(APHABu)得分影响的研究。本研究将调查是否存在这样的关系。

方法

分析了数据库提供的总共2745份记录。首先,将受试者的气导听力图分配到7种标准化听力图类型。通过使用多变量混合线性模型,研究了这些标准听力图与APHABu四个子量表的特定得分之间的潜在联系:EC - 沟通便利性、BN - 背景噪声、RV - 混响、AV - 声音厌恶度。

结果

没有证据表明任何类型的听力损失与未佩戴助听器的APHAB得分之间存在相关性。EC量表上的值在49.8至58.0之间,BN量表上的值在45.3至46.6之间,RV量表上的值在44.4至52.4之间,AV量表上的值在47.6至50.1之间。

讨论

这一结果证实了早期使用其他问卷的研究。因此,无论随后是否佩戴助听器,APHABu都可作为个体听力损失诊断的初始工具。

相似文献

1
[The Influence of Hearing Loss Represented by Standard Audiogram Types to Unaided APHAB Scores].[标准听力图类型所代表的听力损失对未助听APHAB评分的影响]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2016 Aug;95(8):540-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111569. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
2
The influence of frequency-dependent hearing loss to unaided APHAB scores.频率依赖性听力损失对未助听APHAB评分的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3587-3593. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-3966-9. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
3
Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).助听器效益简易量表(APHAB)的敏感性和特异性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3593-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4680-y. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
4
Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores.特定频率听力损失概率与未助听APHAB评分之间的关联。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;274(3):1345-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB.未助听情况下APHAB的听力测定相关因素
J Am Acad Audiol. 2003 Sep;14(7):361-71.
6
The effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Oticon Medical Ponto Pro in participants with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.奥迪康医疗Ponto Pro中的定向麦克风对单侧感音神经性听力损失患者的有效性。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep;24(8):701-13. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.7.
7
Relationship between acceptable noise level and the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.可接受噪声水平与助听器效益简化概况之间的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Feb;51(1):136-46. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010).
8
[Dependency of APHAB score in the EC subscale on age, gender and subjective hearing loss : Hearing aid fitting in two subjective hearing loss groups].[EC子量表中APHAB评分与年龄、性别及主观听力损失的相关性:两个主观听力损失组的助听器适配]
HNO. 2018 Jul;66(7):550-558. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0500-y.
9
Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.《瑞典版简化助听器获益量表的临床应用及心理测量学特性》
J Am Acad Audiol. 2020 Oct;31(9):656-665. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718702. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.助听器效益的简要概况。
Ear Hear. 1995 Apr;16(2):176-86. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
"I do not hear you!": hearing-impaired cancer patients report their communication experiences.“我没听见你说话!”:听力受损的癌症患者讲述他们的沟通体验。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug;149(9):6557-6567. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04634-0. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
[Correlation between the APHAB questionnaire and the Freiburg monosyllabic test without + with noise].[APHAB问卷与弗赖堡单音节测试在无噪声和有噪声情况下的相关性]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2022 Apr;101(4):304-309. doi: 10.1055/a-1528-7555. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
[Dependency of APHAB score in the EC subscale on age, gender and subjective hearing loss : Hearing aid fitting in two subjective hearing loss groups].
[EC子量表中APHAB评分与年龄、性别及主观听力损失的相关性:两个主观听力损失组的助听器适配]
HNO. 2018 Jul;66(7):550-558. doi: 10.1007/s00106-018-0500-y.
4
Hearing aids: indications, technology, adaptation, and quality control.助听器:适应症、技术、适配及质量控制。
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec 18;16:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/cto000147. eCollection 2017.
5
Sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB).助听器效益简易量表(APHAB)的敏感性和特异性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3593-3598. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4680-y. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
6
[APHAB scores for individual assessment of the benefit of hearing aid fitting].[用于助听器验配益处个体评估的APHAB评分]
HNO. 2017 Nov;65(11):901-909. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0350-z.
7
Associations between the probabilities of frequency-specific hearing loss and unaided APHAB scores.特定频率听力损失概率与未助听APHAB评分之间的关联。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Mar;274(3):1345-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4385-7. Epub 2016 Nov 17.