Dwivedi M K, Srivastava R N, Bhagat A K, Agarwal R, Baghel K, Jain A, Raj S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, U.P., India.
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, U.P., India.
J Wound Care. 2016 Apr;25(4):199-200, 202-4, 206-7. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.4.199.
OBJECTIVE: A randomised controlled trial to compare negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) using our innovative negative pressure device (NPD) and the standard pressure ulcer (PU) wound dressing of in traumatic paraplegia patients. METHOD: This study was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. Traumatic paraplegia patients with sacral pressure ulcers of stage 3 and 4 were randomised into two groups, receiving either standard wound dressings or NPWT with NPD. The outcomes monitored were length, width (surface area), depth of PU, exudates, discharge, tissue type (necrotic, slough and red granulating tissue), and cost-effectiveness during 0 to 9 weeks follow-up. RESULTS: Length and width were significantly (p<0.01) decreased in NPWT group as compared with standard care group at week 9. At weeks 1, 2 and 3, depth was significantly (p<0.05) higher in NPWT group, whereas at week 9 a significant reduction (p=0.01) was observed. Exudates were significantly (p=0.001) lower in NPWT group at weeks 4 and 9. Conversion of slough into red granulation tissue was significantly higher in NPWT group (p=0.001). Discharge became significantly (p=0.001) lower in NPWT at week 2 and no discharge was observed after week 6. In all parameters, decrease was larger in NPWT group compared with standard care, which was significant for exudates type (p=0.03) and tissue type (p=0.004). CONCLUSION: Our NPD is better than standard wound care procedures and cost-effective for management of PU.
目的:进行一项随机对照试验,比较使用我们创新的负压装置(NPD)的负压伤口治疗(NPWT)与创伤性截瘫患者的标准压疮(PU)伤口敷料。 方法:本研究在印度勒克瑙乔治国王医科大学骨科进行。将患有3期和4期骶部压疮的创伤性截瘫患者随机分为两组,分别接受标准伤口敷料或使用NPD的NPWT。监测的结果包括PU的长度、宽度(表面积)、深度、渗出物、分泌物、组织类型(坏死、腐肉和红色肉芽组织)以及0至9周随访期间的成本效益。 结果:与标准护理组相比,NPWT组在第9周时长度和宽度显著(p<0.01)减小。在第1、2和3周时,NPWT组的深度显著(p<0.05)更高,而在第9周时观察到显著降低(p=0.01)。在第4周和第9周时,NPWT组的渗出物显著(p=0.001)更低。NPWT组腐肉转化为红色肉芽组织的比例显著更高(p=0.001)。在第2周时,NPWT组的分泌物显著(p=0.001)减少,第6周后未观察到分泌物。在所有参数中,NPWT组的下降幅度均大于标准护理组,渗出物类型(p=0.03)和组织类型(p=0.004)差异显著。 结论:我们的NPD优于标准伤口护理程序,且在PU管理方面具有成本效益。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012
Diving Hyperb Med. 2011-9
Br J Community Nurs. 2013-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-6-22