• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过一期缝合联合闭合切口负压伤口治疗(CiNPWT)进行简单高效的压疮重建——单中心经验

Simple and Efficient Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction via Primary Closure Combined with Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CiNPWT)-Experience of a Single Surgeon.

作者信息

Hsu Kuo-Feng, Kao Li-Ting, Chu Pei-Yi, Chen Chun-Yu, Chou Yu-Yu, Huang Dun-Wei, Liu Ting-Hsuan, Tsai Sheng-Lin, Wu Chien-Wei, Hou Chih-Chun, Wang Chih-Hsin, Dai Niann-Tzyy, Chen Shyi-Gen, Tzeng Yuan-Sheng

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.

Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114202, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):182. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020182.

DOI:10.3390/jpm12020182
PMID:35207670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8875003/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy (CiNPWT) when combined with primary closure (PC) in a patient with pressure ulcers, based on one single surgeon's experience at our medical center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with stage III or IV pressure ulcers who underwent reconstruction surgery. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, cause and location of defect, comorbidities, lesion size, wound reconstruction methods, operation time, debridement times, application of CiNPWT to reconstructed wounds, duration of hospital stay, and wound complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Operation time (38.16 ± 14.02 vs. 84.73 ± 48.55 min) and duration of hospitalization (36.78 ± 26.92 vs. 56.70 ± 58.43 days) were shorter in the PC + CiNPWT group than in the traditional group. The frequency of debridement (2.13 ± 0.98 vs. 2.76 ± 2.20 times) was also lower in the PC + CiNPWT group than in the traditional group. The average reconstructed wound size did not significantly differ between the groups (63.47 ± 42.70 vs. 62.85 ± 49.94 cm), and there were no significant differences in wound healing (81.25% vs. 75.38%), minor complications (18.75% vs. 21.54%), major complications (0% vs. 3.85%), or mortality (6.25% vs. 10.00%) between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that PC combined with CiNPWT represents an alternative reconstruction option for patients with pressure ulcers, especially in those for whom prolonged anesthesia is unsuitable.

摘要

背景

在本研究中,我们旨在基于我们医疗中心一位外科医生的经验,分析闭合切口负压伤口治疗(CiNPWT)联合一期缝合(PC)治疗压疮患者的临床疗效。

方法

我们回顾性分析了接受重建手术的III期或IV期压疮患者的数据。分析了患者特征,包括年龄、性别、缺损原因和部位、合并症、病变大小、伤口重建方法、手术时间、清创次数、CiNPWT在重建伤口上的应用、住院时间和伤口并发症。

结果

PC + CiNPWT组的手术时间(38.16 ± 14.02 vs. 84.73 ± 48.55分钟)和住院时间(36.78 ± 26.92 vs. 56.70 ± 58.43天)均短于传统组。PC + CiNPWT组的清创频率(2.13 ± 0.98 vs. 2.76 ± 2.20次)也低于传统组。两组间平均重建伤口大小无显著差异(63.47 ± 42.70 vs. 62.85 ± 49.94平方厘米),两组间伤口愈合情况(81.25% vs. 75.38%)、轻微并发症(18.75% vs. 21.54%)、严重并发症(0% vs. 3.85%)或死亡率(6.25% vs. 10.00%)均无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,PC联合CiNPWT是压疮患者的一种替代重建选择,特别是对于那些不适合长时间麻醉的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/6c25d34ed2f5/jpm-12-00182-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/0e287cabf749/jpm-12-00182-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/a11db96115d0/jpm-12-00182-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/526a7ad7af15/jpm-12-00182-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/6c25d34ed2f5/jpm-12-00182-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/0e287cabf749/jpm-12-00182-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/a11db96115d0/jpm-12-00182-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/526a7ad7af15/jpm-12-00182-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8b3/8875003/6c25d34ed2f5/jpm-12-00182-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Simple and Efficient Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction via Primary Closure Combined with Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (CiNPWT)-Experience of a Single Surgeon.通过一期缝合联合闭合切口负压伤口治疗(CiNPWT)进行简单高效的压疮重建——单中心经验
J Pers Med. 2022 Jan 29;12(2):182. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020182.
2
Efficacy of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Abdominal Donor Site After Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.封闭式切口负压伤口疗法在游离皮瓣乳房重建术后腹部供区的疗效。
Wounds. 2021 Apr;33(4):81-85.
3
The Usefulness of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脊柱融合术后应用封闭式切口负压伤口治疗的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:258-267.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.048. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Prospective evaluation of a closed-incision negative pressure wound therapy system in kidney transplantation and its association with wound complications.封闭式负压伤口治疗系统在肾移植中的前瞻性评估及其与伤口并发症的关联
Front Nephrol. 2024 Feb 27;4:1352363. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1352363. eCollection 2024.
5
Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.择期髋关节和膝关节置换术后闭合切口负压伤口治疗的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2402-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.039. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Sponge Width and Tension Off-Loading: A Laboratory Model.闭合切口负压伤口治疗海绵宽度与张力卸载:一种实验室模型
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Sep;85(3):295-298. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002217.
7
Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) to minimize wound-related complications in lower limb reconstruction after bone tumor resection: preliminary proof-of-concept study.闭合式切口负压伤口治疗(ciNPWT)在骨肿瘤切除后下肢重建中减少与伤口相关的并发症:初步概念验证研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Oct;33(7):2895-2902. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03501-5. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
8
Effectiveness of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Infrainguinal Bypass in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中闭合法切口负压伤口治疗在下肢旁路中的效果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 May;102:47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.050. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
9
Efficacy of Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Reducing Postoperative Complications in Breast Reconstruction After Radiotherapy: A Propensity Score Analysis.封闭切口负压伤口治疗对放疗后乳房重建术后并发症的疗效:一项倾向评分分析。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Sep 2;6:ojae073. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae073. eCollection 2024.
10
Controlling the controls: what is negative pressure wound therapy compared to in clinical trials?对照的对照:在临床试验中,负压伤口治疗与什么进行比较?
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):794-805. doi: 10.1111/codi.16465. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Creating Colostomies for Sacral Pressure Ulcers: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.为骶骨压疮行结肠造口术:一项单中心回顾性研究
Int Wound J. 2025 Sep;22(9):e70737. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70737.
2
Surgical Reconstruction of Stage 3 and 4 Pressure Injuries: A Literature Review and Proposed Algorithm from an Interprofessional Working Group.外科重建 3 期和 4 期压力性损伤:来自跨专业工作组的文献综述和建议算法。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2023 May 1;36(5):249-258. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000922708.95424.88.
3
Within-patient randomised clinical trial exploring the development of microskin implantation in the treatment of pressure ulcers.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between neuraxial anaesthesia or general anaesthesia for lower limb revascularisation surgery in adults and clinical outcomes: population based comparative effectiveness study.成人下肢血运重建手术中采用椎管内麻醉或全身麻醉与临床结局的关联:基于人群的比较有效性研究。
BMJ. 2020 Nov 25;371:m4104. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4104.
2
Effect of General Versus Spinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Delirium and Early Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients.全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉对老年患者术后谵妄及早期认知功能障碍的影响
Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug 8;10(4):e101815. doi: 10.5812/aapm.101815. eCollection 2020 Aug.
3
Surgical treatment and strategy in patients with pressure sores: A single-surgeon experience.
一项探索微皮片植入治疗压疮发展的患者内随机临床试验。
Int Wound J. 2023 Aug;20(6):1911-1920. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14051. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
4
Is Instillational Topical Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Peri-Prosthetic Infections of the Breast Effective? A Pilot Study.灌注式局部负压伤口疗法治疗乳房假体周围感染是否有效?一项初步研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 13;12(12):2054. doi: 10.3390/jpm12122054.
压疮患者的手术治疗及策略:单中心经验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 30;99(44):e23022. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023022.
4
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期缝合愈合的手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 1;5(5):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub5.
5
Comparative study between fasciocutaneous and myocutaneous flaps in the surgical treatment of pressure ulcers of the sacral region.骶尾部压疮手术治疗中筋膜皮瓣与肌皮瓣的对比研究
JPRAS Open. 2018 Feb 26;16:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2017.12.001. eCollection 2018 Jun.
6
Closed Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Sponge Width and Tension Off-Loading: A Laboratory Model.闭合切口负压伤口治疗海绵宽度与张力卸载:一种实验室模型
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Sep;85(3):295-298. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002217.
7
General anesthesia vs spinal anesthesia for patients undergoing total-hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术患者全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e14925. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014925.
8
Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Augments Perfusion and Improves Wound Healing in a Swine Model Pilot Study.切口负压伤口治疗增强灌注并改善猪模型试点研究中的伤口愈合
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;82(4S Suppl 3):S222-S227. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001842.
9
Pressure ulcers: Prevention and management.压力性溃疡:预防与管理。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Oct;81(4):893-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.068. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
10
Economic Analysis Based on the Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy after Postoperative Breast Reconstruction.基于术后乳房重建后使用密闭式切口负压治疗的经济学分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1S Management of Surgical Incisions Utilizing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy):36S-40S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005311.