Jacob Shancy Petsel, Lakshmikanth Chikkamenahalli Lakshminarayana, Chaithra Vyala Hanumanthareddy, Kumari Titus Ruth Shantha, Chen Chu-Huang, McIntyre Thomas M, Marathe Gopal Kedihitlu
Department of Studies in Biochemistry, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysuru, 570006, Karnataka, India.
Department of Zoology, St. Philomena's College, Bannimantap, Mysuru, 570015, Karnataka, India.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0153282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153282. eCollection 2016.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) signaling through Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many infectious diseases. Some believe that TLR-mediated pathogenicity is due, in part, to the lipid pro-inflammatory mediator platelet-activating factor (PAF), but this has been questioned. To test the direct contribution of PAF in endotoxemia in murine models, we injected PAF intraperitoneally into Swiss albino mice in the presence and absence of LPS. PAF alone (5 μg/mouse) caused death within 15-20 min, but this could be prevented by pretreating mice with PAF-receptor (PAF-R) antagonists or PAF-acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH). A low dose of LPS (5 mg/kg body wt) did not impair PAF-induced death, whereas higher doses (10 or 20 mg/kg body wt) delayed death, probably via LPS cross-tolerance. Cross-tolerance occurred only when PAF was injected simultaneously with LPS or within 30 min of LPS injection. Tolerance does not appear to be due to an abundant soluble mediator. Histologic examination of lungs and liver and measurement of circulating TNF-α and IL-10 levels suggested that the inflammatory response is not diminished during cross-tolerance. Interestingly, aspirin, a non-specific cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, partially blocked PAF-induced sudden death, whereas NS-398, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, completely protected mice from the lethal effects of PAF. Both COX inhibitors (at 20 mg/kg body wt) independently amplified the cross-tolerance exerted by higher dose of LPS, suggesting that COX-derived eicosanoids may be involved in these events. Thus, PAF does not seem to have a protective role in endotoxemia, but its effects are delayed by LPS in a COX-sensitive way. These findings are likely to shed light on basic aspects of the endotoxin cross-tolerance occurring in many disease conditions and may offer new opportunities for clinical intervention.
通过Toll样受体4(TLR-4)的脂多糖(LPS)信号传导与许多传染病的发病机制有关。一些人认为,TLR介导的致病性部分归因于脂质促炎介质血小板活化因子(PAF),但这一观点受到了质疑。为了在小鼠模型中测试PAF在内毒素血症中的直接作用,我们在有或无LPS的情况下将PAF腹腔注射到瑞士白化小鼠体内。单独注射PAF(5μg/小鼠)会在15 - 20分钟内导致死亡,但通过用PAF受体(PAF-R)拮抗剂或PAF乙酰水解酶(PAF-AH)预处理小鼠可以预防这种情况。低剂量的LPS(5mg/kg体重)不会损害PAF诱导的死亡,而高剂量(10或20mg/kg体重)则会延迟死亡,这可能是通过LPS交叉耐受性实现的。交叉耐受性仅在PAF与LPS同时注射或在LPS注射后30分钟内发生。耐受性似乎不是由于丰富的可溶性介质引起的。对肺和肝脏的组织学检查以及循环中TNF-α和IL-10水平的测量表明,在交叉耐受性期间炎症反应并未减弱。有趣的是,非特异性环氧化酶(COX)抑制剂阿司匹林部分阻断了PAF诱导的猝死,而特异性COX-2抑制剂NS-398则完全保护小鼠免受PAF的致死作用。两种COX抑制剂(20mg/kg体重)均独立增强了高剂量LPS产生的交叉耐受性,这表明COX衍生的类花生酸可能参与了这些事件。因此,PAF在内毒素血症中似乎没有保护作用,但其作用会以COX敏感的方式被LPS延迟。这些发现可能会阐明许多疾病状态下发生的内毒素交叉耐受性的基本方面,并可能为临床干预提供新的机会。