Sen Oznur, Umutoglu Tarik, Aydın Nurdan, Toptas Mehmet, Tutuncu Ayse Cigdem, Bakan Mefkur
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ministry of Health Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bezmialem Vakif University Faculty of Medicine, Vatan Cad, 34093 Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Springerplus. 2016 Mar 8;5:298. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-1963-5. eCollection 2016.
Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) is less frequently employed in general anesthesia. With its high and decelerating inspiratory flow, PCV has faster tidal volume delivery and different gas distribution. The same tidal volume setting, delivered by PCV versus volume-controlled ventilation (VCV), will result in a lower peak airway pressure and reduced risk of barotrauma. We hypothesized that PCV instead of VCV during laparoscopic surgery could achieve lower airway pressures and reduce the systemic stress response. Forty ASA I-II patients were randomly selected to receive either the PCV (Group PC, n = 20) or VCV (Group VC, n = 20) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Blood sampling was made for baseline arterial blood gases (ABG), cortisol, insulin, and glucose levels. General anesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl was employed to all patients. After anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation, patients in Group PC were given pressure support to form 8 mL/kg tidal volume and patients in Group VC was maintained at 8 mL/kg tidal volume calculated using predicted body weight. All patients were maintained with 5 cmH2O positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP). Respiratory parameters were recorded before and 30 min after pneumoperitonium. Assessment of ABG and sampling for cortisol, insulin and glucose levels were repeated 30 min after pneumoperitonium and 60 min after extubation. The P-peak levels observed before (18.9 ± 3.8 versus 15 ± 2.2 cmH2O) and during (23.3 ± 3.8 versus 20.1 ± 2.9 cmH2O) pneumoperitoneum in Group VC were significantly higher. Postoperative partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) values are higher (98 ± 12 versus 86 ± 11 mmHg) in Group PC. Arterial carbon dioxide pressure (PaCO2) values (41.8 ± 5.4 versus 36.7 ± 3.5 mmHg) during pneumoperitonium and post-operative mean cortisol and insulin levels were higher in Group VC. When compared to VCV mode, PCV mode may improve compliance during pneumoperitoneum, improve oxygenation and reduce stress response postoperatively and may be more appropriate in patients having laparoscopic surgery.
压力控制通气(PCV)在全身麻醉中较少使用。由于其吸气流量高且呈减速状态,PCV具有更快的潮气量输送和不同的气体分布。与容量控制通气(VCV)相比,相同的潮气量设置下,PCV会导致气道峰压更低,气压伤风险降低。我们假设在腹腔镜手术中使用PCV而非VCV可实现更低的气道压力并减轻全身应激反应。40例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I-II级患者在腹腔镜胆囊切除术期间被随机分为两组,分别接受PCV(PC组,n = 20)或VCV(VC组,n = 20)。采集血样检测基线动脉血气(ABG)、皮质醇、胰岛素和血糖水平。所有患者均采用七氟烷和芬太尼进行全身麻醉。麻醉诱导和气管插管后,PC组患者给予压力支持以形成8 mL/kg潮气量,VC组患者维持在根据预测体重计算的8 mL/kg潮气量。所有患者均维持5 cmH₂O呼气末正压(PEEP)。记录气腹前及气腹后30分钟的呼吸参数。气腹后30分钟及拔管后60分钟重复评估ABG并采集皮质醇、胰岛素和血糖水平样本。VC组在气腹前(18.9±3.8与15±2.2 cmH₂O)和气腹期间(23.3±3.8与20.1±2.9 cmH₂O)观察到的P峰水平显著更高。PC组术后部分动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)值更高(98±12与86±11 mmHg)。VC组气腹期间的动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)值(41.8±5.4与36.7±3.5 mmHg)以及术后平均皮质醇和胰岛素水平更高。与VCV模式相比,PCV模式可能会改善气腹期间的顺应性,改善氧合并降低术后应激反应,可能更适合接受腹腔镜手术的患者。