Suppr超能文献

在长时间妇科腹腔镜手术中,容量控制通气与压力控制通气的呼吸动力学和死腔潮气量比。

Respiratory dynamics and dead space to tidal volume ratio of volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation during prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgery.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai General Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 650, New Songjiang Road, Shanghai, 201620, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3605-3613. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5392-x. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic operations have become longer and more complex and applied to a broader patient population in the last decades. Prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgeries require prolonged pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, which can influence respiratory dynamics and other measurements of pulmonary function. We investigated the differences between volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and tried to determine the more efficient ventilation mode during prolonged pneumoperitoneum in gynecological laparoscopy.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy combined with or without laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy were randomly allocated to be ventilated by either VCV or PCV. Standard anesthesic management and laparoscopic procedures were performed. Measurements of respiratory and hemodynamic dynamics were obtained after induction of anesthesia, at 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after establishing pneumoperitoneum, and at 10 min after return to supine lithotomy position and removal of carbon dioxide. The logistic regression model was applied to predict the corresponding critical value of duration of pneumoperitoneum when the Ppeak was higher than 40 cmHO.

RESULTS

Prolonged pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position produced significant and clinically relevant changes in dynamic compliance and respiratory mechanics in anesthetized patients under PCV and VCV ventilation. Patients under PCV ventilation had a similar increase of dead space/tidal volume ratio, but had a lower Ppeak increase compared with those under VCV ventilation. The critical value of duration of pneumoperitoneum was predicted to be 355 min under VCV ventilation, corresponding to the risk of Ppeak higher than 40 cmHO.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VCV and PCV can be safely applied to prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgery. However, PCV may become the better choice of ventilation after ruling out of other reasons for Ppeak increasing.

摘要

背景

在过去的几十年中,腹腔镜手术的时间变得更长,操作也更复杂,适用于更广泛的患者人群。长时间的妇科腹腔镜手术需要长时间的气腹和Trendelenburg 体位,这会影响呼吸动力学和其他肺功能测量。我们研究了容量控制通气(VCV)和压力控制通气(PCV)之间的差异,并试图确定在妇科腹腔镜手术中长时间气腹时更有效的通气模式。

方法

将 26 例行腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术加或不加腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结切除术的患者随机分配为接受 VCV 或 PCV 通气。进行标准的麻醉管理和腹腔镜手术。在麻醉诱导后、气腹建立后 10、30、60 和 120 分钟以及恢复仰卧截石位和二氧化碳排出后 10 分钟时,测量呼吸和血流动力学动力学。应用逻辑回归模型预测当 Ppeak 高于 40cmHO 时,气腹持续时间的相应临界值。

结果

长时间的气腹和 Trendelenburg 体位会导致接受 PCV 和 VCV 通气的麻醉患者的动态顺应性和呼吸力学发生显著且具有临床相关性的变化。与 VCV 通气相比,PCV 通气患者的死腔/潮气量比增加相似,但 Ppeak 增加较低。预测 VCV 通气时气腹持续时间的临界值为 355 分钟,对应的 Ppeak 高于 40cmHO 的风险。

结论

VCV 和 PCV 均可安全应用于长时间的妇科腹腔镜手术。然而,在排除 Ppeak 升高的其他原因后,PCV 可能成为更好的通气选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验