• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,采用改良顺铂应用方案的利妥昔单抗DHAP方案具有最小的肾毒性。

Minimal renal toxicity after Rituximab DHAP with a modified cisplatin application scheme in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

作者信息

Lisenko K, McClanahan F, Schöning T, Schwarzbich M A, Cremer M, Dittrich T, Ho A D, Witzens-Harig M

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.

Centre for Haemato-Oncology/Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 11;16:267. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2289-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-016-2289-y
PMID:27067641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4828891/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (R) in combination with DHAP is a widely accepted salvage regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A common adverse effect of this protocol is renal toxicity which may result in treatment discontinuation. Assuming that a lower single dose of cisplatin over several days would reduce renal toxicity, our institution has chosen to administer cisplatin in a dosage of 25 mg/m(2) per day as a 3-h infusion over 4 consecutive days.

METHODS

In this study, we analyzed the renal function of 122 patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL treated with R-DHAP at our institution. Overall, 256 R-DHAP cycles were administered. 31 (25%), 61 (50%), 14 (12%) and 16 (13%) patients received one, two, three or four R-DHAP courses, respectively.

RESULTS

A glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decrease was observed after each R-DHAP cycle. However, in none of the subgroups the median GFR was lower than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). In most patients, only renal impairment stage I and II was observed. Renal impairment stage III was seen in 10% and stage IV only in 1% of patients.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that a modified R-DHAP regimen with administration of cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) over 4 consecutive cycles leads only to minimal renal toxicity.

摘要

背景

利妥昔单抗(R)联合DHAP是复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者广泛接受的挽救方案。该方案的常见不良反应是肾毒性,这可能导致治疗中断。假设在几天内较低剂量的顺铂单药治疗会降低肾毒性,我们机构选择以25mg/m²的剂量连续4天每天3小时输注顺铂。

方法

在本研究中,我们分析了在我们机构接受R-DHAP治疗的122例复发或难治性DLBCL患者的肾功能。总共进行了256个R-DHAP周期。分别有31例(25%)、61例(50%)、14例(12%)和16例(13%)患者接受了1个、2个、3个或4个R-DHAP疗程。

结果

每个R-DHAP周期后均观察到肾小球滤过率(GFR)下降。然而,在任何亚组中,GFR中位数均不低于60ml/min/1.73m²。大多数患者仅观察到I期和II期肾功能损害。10%的患者出现III期肾功能损害,仅1%的患者出现IV期肾功能损害。

结论

我们得出结论,连续4个周期给予25mg/m²顺铂的改良R-DHAP方案仅导致最小程度的肾毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/7fb372d5076b/12885_2016_2289_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/47665f81cda3/12885_2016_2289_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/aebbc809925d/12885_2016_2289_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/7fb372d5076b/12885_2016_2289_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/47665f81cda3/12885_2016_2289_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/aebbc809925d/12885_2016_2289_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b05/4828891/7fb372d5076b/12885_2016_2289_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal renal toxicity after Rituximab DHAP with a modified cisplatin application scheme in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.在复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,采用改良顺铂应用方案的利妥昔单抗DHAP方案具有最小的肾毒性。
BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 11;16:267. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2289-y.
2
Ofatumumab Versus Rituximab Salvage Chemoimmunotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: The ORCHARRD Study.奥法妥珠单抗对比利妥昔单抗挽救化疗免疫治疗复发或难治弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤:ORCHARRD 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 10;35(5):544-551. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.0198. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
3
Efficient Stem Cell Collection after Modified Cisplatin-Based Mobilization Chemotherapy in Patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.基于顺铂的改良动员化疗后弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的高效干细胞采集
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Aug;22(8):1397-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
A phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety, feasibility and activity of salvage therapy consisting of the mTOR inhibitor Temsirolimus added to standard therapy of Rituximab and DHAP for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large cell B-Cell lymphoma - the STORM trial.一项 I/II 期临床试验,旨在评估挽救性治疗的安全性、可行性和疗效,该治疗方案由 mTOR 抑制剂替西罗莫司联合标准治疗方案利妥昔单抗和 DHAP(地塞米松、阿糖胞苷、顺铂)组成,用于治疗复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者 - STORM 试验。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Jun 25;13:308. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-308.
5
DHAP in combination with rituximab vs DHAP alone as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a matched-pair analysis.以吉西他滨、阿糖胞苷和顺铂联合利妥昔单抗对比单纯吉西他滨、阿糖胞苷和顺铂作为复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者挽救治疗的配对分析。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2006 Dec;47(12):2558-66. doi: 10.1080/10428190600926572.
6
Comparison of ICE (ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide) versus DHAP (cytosine arabinoside-cisplatin-dexamethasone) as salvage chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.异环磷酰胺-卡铂-依托泊苷(ICE)与阿糖胞苷-顺铂-地塞米松(DHAP)作为复发或难治性淋巴瘤患者挽救性化疗的比较
Cancer Invest. 2008 May;26(4):401-6. doi: 10.1080/07357900701788098.
7
Lenalidomide in combination with R-ESHAP in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 1b study from GELTAMO group.来那度胺联合R-ESHAP方案治疗复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者:GELTAMO组的1b期研究
Br J Haematol. 2016 Apr;173(2):245-52. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13945. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
8
A review of R-DHAP administration in the outpatient setting and a case of the alternative regimen R-DHAX given outpatient for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.门诊环境中R-DHAP方案给药的综述以及1例难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤门诊使用替代方案R-DHAX的病例。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2019 Dec;25(8):2041-2044. doi: 10.1177/1078155218820108. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
Dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin in combination with rituximab as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.地塞米松、大剂量阿糖胞苷和顺铂联合利妥昔单抗作为复发或难治性侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的挽救治疗方案。
Cancer Invest. 2006 Oct;24(6):593-600. doi: 10.1080/07357900600814490.
10
The germinal center/activated B-cell subclassification has a prognostic impact for response to salvage therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a bio-CORAL study.生发中心/活化 B 细胞亚类对复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤挽救治疗反应的预后影响:一项生物 CORAL 研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 1;29(31):4079-87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.4423. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Combination of Decitabine and a Modified Regimen of Cisplatin, Cytarabine and Dexamethasone: A Potential Salvage Regimen for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Second-Line Treatment Failure.地西他滨与顺铂、阿糖胞苷和地塞米松改良方案的联合应用:二线治疗失败后复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的一种潜在挽救方案
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 18;11:687374. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.687374. eCollection 2021.
2
The impact of overweight on renal toxicity in patients treated with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and cisplatin.超重对接受地塞米松、大剂量阿糖胞苷和顺铂治疗的患者肾毒性的影响。
Int J Hematol. 2020 Mar;111(3):396-400. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02779-8. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Aprepitant, granisetron, and dexamethasone for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after high-dose melphalan in autologous transplantation for multiple myeloma: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial.阿瑞匹坦、格拉司琼和地塞米松预防高剂量美法仑自体移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤后化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项随机、安慰剂对照的 III 期试验结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20;32(30):3413-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.55.0095. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
2
Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.复发/难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:498-505. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.498.
3
Systematic review of therapy used in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma.
复发或难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤和滤泡性淋巴瘤治疗的系统评价
Future Sci OA. 2018 Jul 19;4(7):FSO322. doi: 10.4155/fsoa-2018-0049. eCollection 2018 Jul.
Rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (R-DHAX) is an effective and safe salvage regimen in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
利妥昔单抗、地塞米松、阿糖胞苷和奥沙利铂(R-DHAX)是一种在复发/难治性 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤中有效的、安全的挽救方案。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2010 Aug;10(4):262-9. doi: 10.3816/CLML.2010.n.055.
4
Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era.利妥昔单抗时代复发的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的自体移植挽救治疗方案。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 20;28(27):4184-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.1618. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
5
Modified outpatient dexamethazone, cytarabine and cisplatin regimen may lead to high response rates and low toxicity in lymphoma.改良后的门诊地塞米松、阿糖胞苷和顺铂方案可能会使淋巴瘤的高反应率和低毒性。
Med Princ Pract. 2010;19(5):344-7. doi: 10.1159/000316370. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
6
A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate.一种估算肾小球滤过率的新公式。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006.
7
Salvage chemotherapy with rituximab DHAP for relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a phase II trial in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.利妥昔单抗联合DHAP方案挽救性化疗用于复发非霍奇金淋巴瘤:北中部癌症治疗组的一项II期试验
Leuk Lymphoma. 2008 Jun;49(6):1074-80. doi: 10.1080/10428190801993470.
8
Six versus eight cycles of bi-weekly CHOP-14 with or without rituximab in elderly patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphomas: a randomised controlled trial (RICOVER-60).老年侵袭性CD20+B细胞淋巴瘤患者接受每两周一次的CHOP-14方案化疗6周期与8周期并联合或不联合利妥昔单抗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验(RICOVER-60)
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Feb;9(2):105-16. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70002-0. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
9
Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.利妥昔单抗联合CHOP方案与单纯CHOP方案或CHOP方案联合利妥昔单抗维持治疗老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3121-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1003. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
10
CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,CHOP化疗联合利妥昔单抗与单纯CHOP化疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 24;346(4):235-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795.