Ari Gnanasakthy, Carla DeMuro, Marci Clark, and Emily Haydysch, RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC; and Esprit Ma and Vijayveer Bonthapally, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1928-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6480. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
To review the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data in medical product labeling granted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for new molecular entities and biologic license applications by the FDA Office of Hematology and Oncology Products (OHOP) between January 2010 and December 2014, to elucidate challenges faced by OHOP for approving PRO labeling, and to understand challenges faced by drug manufacturers to include PRO end points in oncology clinical trials.
FDA Drug Approval Reports by Month were reviewed to obtain the number of new molecular entities and biologic license applications approved from 2010 to 2014. Drugs approved by the FDA OHOP during this period were selected for further review, focusing on brand and generic name; approval date; applicant; indication; PRO labeling describing treatment benefit, measures, end point status, and significant results; FDA reviewer feedback on PRO end points; and study design of registration trials. First in class, priority review, fast track, orphan drug, or accelerated approval status was retrieved for selected oncology drugs from 2011 to 2014. Descriptive analyses were performed by using Microsoft Excel 2010.
Of 160 drugs approved by the FDA (2010-2014), 40 were approved by OHOP. Three (7.5%) of the 40 received PRO-related labeling (abiraterone acetate, ruxolitinib phosphate, and crizotinib). Compared with nononcology drugs (2011-2014), oncology drugs were more likely to be orphan and first in class. The majority of oncology drug reviews by FDA were fast track, priority, or accelerated.
Although symptoms and functional decrements are common among patients with cancer, PRO labeling is rare in the United States, likely because of logistical hurdles and oncology study design. Recent developments within the FDA OHOP to capture PROs in oncology studies for the purpose of product labeling are encouraging.
回顾 2010 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月期间,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的血液学和肿瘤产品办公室(OHOP)批准的新分子实体和生物制品许可申请(BLA)中使用患者报告的结局(PRO)数据。阐明 OHOP 在批准 PRO 标签方面面临的挑战,并了解制药商在肿瘤学临床试验中纳入 PRO 终点所面临的挑战。
通过审查每月的 FDA 药物批准报告,获得了 2010 年至 2014 年批准的新分子实体和生物制品许可申请的数量。选择在此期间获得 OHOP 批准的药物进行进一步审查,重点关注品牌和通用名;批准日期;申请人;适应证;描述治疗益处、措施、终点状态和显著结果的 PRO 标签;FDA 审查员对 PRO 终点的反馈;以及注册试验的研究设计。从 2011 年至 2014 年,检索了选定肿瘤药物的首创新药、优先审查、快速通道、孤儿药或加速批准状态。使用 Microsoft Excel 2010 进行描述性分析。
在 160 种由 FDA 批准的药物(2010-2014 年)中,有 40 种由 OHOP 批准。其中 3 种(7.5%)获得了与 PRO 相关的标签(醋酸阿比特龙、磷酸鲁索利替尼和克唑替尼)。与非肿瘤药物(2011-2014 年)相比,肿瘤药物更有可能是孤儿药和首创新药。FDA 对大多数肿瘤药物的审查是快速通道、优先审查或加速审查。
尽管癌症患者经常出现症状和功能下降,但美国 PRO 标签很少见,这可能是由于后勤障碍和肿瘤学研究设计。FDA OHOP 最近为在肿瘤学研究中捕获 PRO 以用于产品标签而采取的措施令人鼓舞。