Suppr超能文献

通过数字PCR进行的突变DNA定量可能会因DNA片段化过程中的加热而受到干扰。

Mutant DNA quantification by digital PCR can be confounded by heating during DNA fragmentation.

作者信息

Kang Qing, Parkin Brian, Giraldez Maria D, Tewari Muneesh

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Biotechniques. 2016 Apr 1;60(4):175-6, 178, 180 passim. doi: 10.2144/000114401. eCollection 2016 Apr.

Abstract

Digital PCR (dPCR) is gaining popularity as a DNA mutation quantification method for clinical specimens. Fragmentation prior to dPCR is required for non-fragmented genomic DNA samples; however, the effect of fragmentation on DNA analysis has not been well-studied. Here we evaluated three fragmentation methods for their effects on dPCR point mutation assay performance. Wild-type (WT) human genomic DNA was fragmented by heating, restriction digestion, or acoustic shearing using a Covaris focused-ultrasonicator. dPCR was then used to determine the limit of blank (LoB) by quantifying observed WT and mutant allele counts of the proto-oncogenes KRAS and BRAF in the WT DNA sample. DNA fragmentation by heating to 95°C, while the simplest and least expensive method, produced a high background mutation frequency for certain KRAS mutations relative to the other methods. This was due to heat-induced mutations, specifically affecting dPCR assays designed to interrogate guanine to adenine (G>A) mutations. Moreover, heat-induced fragmentation overestimated gene copy number, potentially due to denaturation and partition of single-stranded DNA into different droplets. Covaris acoustic shearing and restriction enzyme digestion showed similar LoBs and gene copy number estimates to one another. It should be noted that moderate heating, commonly used in genomic DNA extraction protocols, did not significantly increase observed KRAS mutation counts.

摘要

数字PCR(dPCR)作为一种用于临床样本的DNA突变定量方法正越来越受欢迎。对于未片段化的基因组DNA样本,dPCR之前需要进行片段化;然而,片段化对DNA分析的影响尚未得到充分研究。在此,我们评估了三种片段化方法对dPCR点突变检测性能的影响。野生型(WT)人类基因组DNA通过加热、限制性酶切或使用Covaris聚焦超声破碎仪进行声学剪切来片段化。然后使用dPCR通过量化野生型DNA样本中原癌基因KRAS和BRAF的野生型和突变等位基因计数来确定空白限(LoB)。加热至95°C进行DNA片段化,虽然是最简单且最廉价的方法,但相对于其他方法,对于某些KRAS突变产生了较高的背景突变频率。这是由于热诱导突变,特别是影响旨在检测鸟嘌呤到腺嘌呤(G>A)突变的dPCR检测。此外,热诱导片段化高估了基因拷贝数,可能是由于单链DNA的变性和分配到不同液滴中。Covaris声学剪切和限制性酶切显示出彼此相似的LoB和基因拷贝数估计。应该注意的是,基因组DNA提取方案中常用的适度加热并没有显著增加观察到的KRAS突变计数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验